BBO Discussion Forums: When no cue is avable... - BBO Discussion Forums

Jump to content

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

When no cue is avable...

Poll: your bid (25 member(s) have cast votes)

your bid

  1. pass (0 votes [0.00%])

    Percentage of vote: 0.00%

  2. 3 diamonds (8 votes [32.00%])

    Percentage of vote: 32.00%

  3. 3 hearts (11 votes [44.00%])

    Percentage of vote: 44.00%

  4. 3 spades (1 votes [4.00%])

    Percentage of vote: 4.00%

  5. 3NT (5 votes [20.00%])

    Percentage of vote: 20.00%

  6. 4 clubs (0 votes [0.00%])

    Percentage of vote: 0.00%

  7. 5 clubs (0 votes [0.00%])

    Percentage of vote: 0.00%

Vote Guests cannot vote

#1 User is offline   Fluffy 

  • World International Master without a clue
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 17,404
  • Joined: 2003-November-13
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:madrid

Posted 2007-December-31, 10:03

Scoring: IMP

W - N - E - S
2*-3-ps-??


2* = multi
0

#2 User is offline   kenrexford 

  • Brain Farts and Actual Farts Increasing with Age
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 9,586
  • Joined: 2005-September-21
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Lima, Allen County, North-West-Central Ohio, USA
  • Interests:www.limadbc.blogspot.com editor/contributor

Posted 2007-December-31, 10:20

IMO, this particular auction works well if 3 is forcing and either natural OR a punt bid. Even if undiscussed, that's my choice.
"Gibberish in, gibberish out. A trial judge, three sets of lawyers, and now three appellate judges cannot agree on what this law means. And we ask police officers, prosecutors, defense lawyers, and citizens to enforce or abide by it? The legislature continues to write unreadable statutes. Gibberish should not be enforced as law."

-P.J. Painter.
0

#3 User is offline   pclayton 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 9,151
  • Joined: 2003-June-11
  • Location:Southern California

Posted 2007-December-31, 10:22

I chose 3 but this feels like a very tough problem. I'm curious how the players that frequently play against multi handle this.
"Phil" on BBO
0

#4 User is offline   jdonn 

  • - - T98765432 AQT8
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 15,085
  • Joined: 2005-June-23
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Las Vegas, NV

Posted 2007-December-31, 10:26

In my multi defense, responder can ask about major suit stoppers with 3, and you can still work it out in time if opener has a four card major instead.
Please let me know about any questions or interest or bug reports about GIB.
0

#5 User is offline   pclayton 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 9,151
  • Joined: 2003-June-11
  • Location:Southern California

Posted 2007-December-31, 10:28

jdonn, on Dec 31 2007, 08:26 AM, said:

In my multi defense, responder can ask about major suit stoppers with 3, and you can still work it out in time if opener has a four card major instead.

What would you do if the overcall is 3?
"Phil" on BBO
0

#6 User is offline   jdonn 

  • - - T98765432 AQT8
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 15,085
  • Joined: 2005-June-23
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Las Vegas, NV

Posted 2007-December-31, 10:32

pclayton, on Dec 31 2007, 11:28 AM, said:

jdonn, on Dec 31 2007, 08:26 AM, said:

In my multi defense, responder can ask about major suit stoppers with 3, and you can still work it out in time if opener has a four card major instead.

What would you do if the overcall is 3?

3 = hearts or stopper.
--- 3 = I raise hearts.
(yes this doesn't let you find a 4-4 spade fit when advancer has longer hearts, but you can still do so over 3. 3 leaves you less space.)
Please let me know about any questions or interest or bug reports about GIB.
0

#7 User is offline   JanM 

  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 737
  • Joined: 2006-January-31

Posted 2008-January-01, 00:41

jdonn, on Dec 31 2007, 11:32 AM, said:

pclayton, on Dec 31 2007, 11:28 AM, said:

jdonn, on Dec 31 2007, 08:26 AM, said:

In my multi defense, responder can ask about major suit stoppers with 3, and you can still work it out in time if opener has a four card major instead.

What would you do if the overcall is 3?

3 = hearts or stopper.
--- 3 = I raise hearts.
(yes this doesn't let you find a 4-4 spade fit when advancer has longer hearts, but you can still do so over 3. 3 leaves you less space.)

I think I originated that particular gadget (it's one of the few things in our multi defense that Chip didn't invent :)), although we recommend it to others only when using a written defense - when the multi defense has to be memorized it's a little dangerous. It's certainly good on this type of hand, allowing the responder to bid 3 and find either a 4-4 heart fit or stoppers in both majors to play 3NT.
By the way, for those who have laughed at me when I mention that our multi defense is 11 pages long, it's that long because of things like playing 3 here as 2-way. It doesn't come up often, but it is definitely worth having when it does.

On this particular hand, I think that if I couldn't bid 3 and then be able to get to either a 4-4 heart fit or 3NT when partner had a spade stopper, I'd pass. This is a fairly marginal advance of the 3 overcall, and I'm bidding only because I don't think partner would stretch to overcall on a suit missing the KQ, but I know I might be turning a plus into a minus by bidding. If partner has something like xx, AQx, xx, AJxxxx, 3 is the limit of the hand. I bid because if partner has x, AQJx, xx, AJxxxx, 4 is cold and if partner has Kxx, Ax, Jx, AJxxxx, 3NT is cold, so bidding can turn a small plus into a much larger one, thus is worth the risk. But if I have to make an inaccurate bid (either 3 or 3 natural) or one where I won't know what partner's next bid means (3 without a clear agreement that 3 by partner can be either a stopper or 4 hearts), the risk/reward ration changes.
Jan Martel, who should probably state that she is not speaking on behalf of the USBF, the ACBL, the WBF Systems Committee, or any member of any Systems Committee or Laws Commission.
0

#8 Guest_Jlall_*

  • Group: Guests

Posted 2008-January-01, 13:58

very slow 3D bid
0

#9 User is offline   whereagles 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 14,900
  • Joined: 2004-May-11
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Portugal
  • Interests:Everything!

Posted 2008-January-01, 14:27

this is an easy 3NT for me. Very easy indeed.
0

#10 User is offline   SchTsch 

  • PipPipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 114
  • Joined: 2005-November-07

Posted 2008-January-03, 08:58

3
0

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

3 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 3 guests, 0 anonymous users