MP in a BBO indy. 15-17 NT openers. UR bid.
Competitive bidding after a 1 NT open You are in the pass out seat
#2
Posted 2007-May-25, 00:38
- hrothgar
#3
Posted 2007-May-25, 01:08
I wouldn't had supperaccepted, I still count my HCP on balanced hands
#4
Posted 2007-May-25, 01:23
#6
Posted 2007-May-25, 08:45
Once every 10 hands, you'll make 4♥ after this auction. The look at opps' face when u make 4♥ will be quite pleasant.
btw 3♣ has a strange appeal (unless you open 1NT on 2425 hands).
George Carlin
#7
Posted 2007-May-25, 09:08
I will be a sheep and follow the crowd with a 3♥ bid here. At the very least, I should have LOTT protection, we have at least a nine card heart fit, and I think WEST has six-seven spades all by himself. Funny how LOTT proection is often no protection at all, however. I hope it doesn't go 3♥X all pass.... but it only matchpoints afterall, the worse I can do is get a zero.
#8
Posted 2007-May-25, 11:54
I don't really understand bidding only 2H. We have great trumps, two outside aces and potential ruffing value. This looks like a good hand to me. Just counting HCP seems wrong.
- hrothgar
#9
Posted 2007-May-25, 12:04
Hannie, on May 25 2007, 12:54 PM, said:
I don't really understand bidding only 2H. We have great trumps, two outside aces and potential ruffing value. This looks like a good hand to me. Just counting HCP seems wrong.
I like bidding 3♥ the first time on the understanding it doesn't promise a max, just a good looking minimum, and using all the other inbetween bids for real super accepts.
I understand your desire to have bid 3♥ before, but I don't think it's even an option without a special agreement. Partner will bid game over that on some relatively weak hands, expecting you to truly have a max.
#10
Posted 2007-May-25, 14:47
Obviously wrong, but why can't I suggest +200 at MP?
Intelligent partner is still there.
#11
Posted 2007-May-25, 14:53
Halo, on May 25 2007, 03:47 PM, said:
I doubt it, this is an individual. Besides, how is partner supposed to know that you have such a great hand for hearts and a rather poor hand for defending 2S?
Josh, I agree that in a pick-up partnership it may be wrong to bid 3H, but I would do it if I were playing with a partner I respect, or even with you . So let me rephrase: I don't understand why someone would agree that it is not permitted to superaccept with a hand as good as this one.
- hrothgar
#12 Guest_Jlall_*
Posted 2007-May-25, 20:10
3H now is routine. I do believe that by super accepting we will lose far more by getting to terrible 3 and 4H contracts when we could have bought it for lower than we will gain by getting to good games that would be missed or preempting the opponents.
#13
Posted 2007-May-25, 21:29
Of course I play 123 stop also, so...
#14
Posted 2007-May-25, 22:10
Give partner x J10xxxx xxx Q10x and game is basically on a hook, but I doubt partner will bid it over a minimum superaccept. Moreover, the opponents likely make 4S if partner has that hand. I admit that this is a perfect fit, and that all of our cards except the spade jack are working. I do think that the spade jack is the only really bad point in our hand.
I appreciate your comment as always but I have to think some more about this one before I accept it as wisdom.
- hrothgar
#15 Guest_Jlall_*
Posted 2007-May-25, 22:56
Hannie, on May 25 2007, 11:10 PM, said:
If partner has 6 hearts I would also rather have the HQ somewhere else that is useful than in hearts. I don't think it is always wasted I just don't see it as a great card. It is pretty average.
Quote
That is not what I said.
jlall said:
Super accepting already shows 4+ trumps. You cannot upgrade a hand to a super accept because it has 4 trumps. My point is simply that of hands that you are super accepting with you are accepting one near the bottom of the range. This would imply you almost always super accept with 4 trumps.
Quote
Ty. This is not the only hand he can have. To evaluate properly you will need to look at more than random perfect fitting hands.
Quote
1) we have no spot cards
2) the club jack is not a great card
3) you're right, stray jacks are terrible
4) our honors don't work well together except for our hearts which is negated by the fact that sometimes that is wasted.
My points are maybe better illustrated by giving a hand of my own
Imagine you had AKxx Qxxx AQx xx. This hand is very good because the honors work well together, xx and AKxx are much better than Ax and Kxxx. Ax is really not a great holding. There are no jacks so if partner is going to bid a slim game that will be helpful. The heart queen alone is a pretty good holding, this is a better hand than say Axxx KQxx AQx xx because their is less chance of wasted values.
#16
Posted 2007-May-25, 23:01
I certainly agree that the hand you gave is a better hand. I also agree that I superaccept with most hands containing 4-card support. :-)
- hrothgar
#17
Posted 2007-May-26, 09:54
Expect a rag escape over there and fear they make 4S.
P-P-1NT-P
2♦-P-2♥-2♠
P-P-???