[benellis58]

Braindead lead by the braindead GIBBO robot in the West. No, his imbecilic lead did NOT work out well for him. Shocking, isn't it, that leading his (chuckle) stiff 9 against 3NT didn't work out?

Why do these rejects even BOTHER?

https://www.bridgeba...S9%7Cpc%7CD7%7C

[benellis58]

Even within the context of their hopeless system, why would North bid 3H with THAT hand? We scored 76 % on the board, so the dweeb probably thinks he bid it brilliantly. I won't tell him the truth if you don't.

https://www.bridgeba...D2%7Cmc%7C11%7C

[benellis58]

Another "challenging" (ha, ha) "defence" by the GIBBO robots. Why don't you give up bridge and take up a new hobby, losers? You GIBBO clowns will NEVER be even halfway decent.

https://www.bridgeba...CSJ%7Cmc%7C9%7C

[benellis58]

1NT...with FIVE (!) overtricks!

Yes, by golly, now that you mention it, GIBBO robots WERE "defending", but how did you guess?

https://www.bridgeba...D8%7Cmc%7C12%7C

[benellis58]

These GENIUSES manage to set up THREE club winners for declarer after the first two tricks have been played, but Heaven FORBID they should take their RUFF at trick three. C.R.E.T.I.N.S.!

Remind me again, o ye staunch defenders of GIBBO honour: If I'm not mistaken, you said that the GIBBO robots are "far better than most human players". Do I have that right? Just checking.

https://www.bridgeba...H3%7Cpc%7CDK%7C

[benellis58]

ANOTHER laughable "defence". Gee, I guess no one could have seen THAT coming. And by "no one", I mean not more than 100 million people.

https://www.bridgeba...HT%7Cpc%7CDJ%7C

[benellis58]

No, the GIBBO robot who "declared" this hand did NOT win a Bols Brilliancy Prize for it. Is anyone surprised? I said, "Is ANYONE surprised?" ANYONE? HELLO? Is this microphone working?

But I shouldn't be mocking the GIBBO robot's DECLARER play, because, to be fair, I once saw a TURTLE declare a hand ALMOST as badly.

https://www.bridgeba...S6%7Cpc%7CC4%7C

[benellis58]

The lucky stiff got to make one of his FAOURITE (stupid) leads, his stiff trump.

Sorry, my hearing is not that good. What's that question you asked?

Thanks for repeating your question. I apologize for not hearing it the first time, and I'm happy to answer: No, his lead did NOT work out well. Does it EVER?

https://www.bridgeba...D7%7Cmc%7C11%7C

[benellis58]

North adds to the MOUNTAIN of evidence proving that the GIBBO robots know NOTHING about how to bid two-suiters, but luckily we get a shared top anyway, despite his legendary lack of knowledge.

https://www.bridgeba...C9%7Cpc%7CSJ%7C

[benellis58]

I have an easy question and a difficult question.

The Easy Question: In reference to the GIBBO robots, what is the BEST part of their bridge game?

Answer: EASY! Declarer play, by far! Not that they are great (because they sure as Hell are NOT!), but they are not as astoundingly horrendous as they are at every other facet of bridge.

The Hard Question: In reference to the GIBBO robots, what is the WORST part of their bridge game?

Answer: Too tough to answer. Sometimes I think it's their nauseating, braindead bidding. Sometimes I think it's their stupid, illogical leads. Sometimes I think it's their horrendous, compellingly wretched "defence". The bottom line is that I cannot decide, becauser they are so STUNNINGLY bad at all three. They are the worst bidders I have ever encountered, the worst leaders, and the worst "defenders", so maybe you can distinguish, but I can't, because they are sickeningly bad at EVERYTHING except declarer play.

[benellis58]

North's 2D? No way to even suggest the possibility of SPADES in the hopeless, antiquated GIBBO system?

West's 3H? Fair enough, but if so, then...change the definition (!), because he certainly does not have "13-16 total points".

https://www.bridgeba...CC2%7Cmc%7C9%7C