BBO Discussion Forums: Secondary Diamonds - BBO Discussion Forums

Jump to content

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

Secondary Diamonds

#1 User is offline   lamford 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 6,446
  • Joined: 2007-October-15

Posted 2017-April-09, 12:21



London Superleague. Do you bid again and if so what?
I prefer to give the lawmakers credit for stating things for a reason - barmar
0

#2 User is offline   nullve 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 2,299
  • Joined: 2014-April-08
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Norway
  • Interests:partscores

Posted 2017-April-09, 13:42

3N
0

#3 User is offline   ahydra 

  • AQT92 AQ --- QJ6532
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 2,840
  • Joined: 2009-September-09
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Wellington, NZ

Posted 2017-April-09, 13:59

Call me a wimp if you will but I'd just pass. We're at the 4-level, partner probably has a few spades but not much else, we're at unfavourable and the opps know almost exactly what each other have. It's a death trap.

ahydra
1

#4 User is offline   broze 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 1,006
  • Joined: 2011-March-08
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:UK

Posted 2017-April-09, 14:03

Absolutely not
'In an infinite universe, the one thing sentient life cannot afford to have is a sense of proportion.' - Douglas Adams
0

#5 User is offline   FelicityR 

  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 980
  • Joined: 2012-October-26
  • Gender:Female

Posted 2017-April-09, 14:27

You wouldn't reverse on this hand as an opener so why should you even contemplate as an overcaller showing ♦s especially at red/white with a passed partner? That ♦AK is already part of your overcall, and whilst the ♣ suit is long, it is also tatty.

You might have good play for a vulnerable sacrifice if partner turns up with the right cards and shape, but the 3♣ bidder could be unlimited. Better to keep quiet I feel.
0

#6 User is offline   SteveMoe 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 1,168
  • Joined: 2012-May-17
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Cincinnati Unit 124
  • Interests:Family, Travel, Bridge Tournaments and Writing. Youth Bridge

Posted 2017-April-09, 14:50

Pass
Be the partner you want to play with.
Trust demands integrity, balance and collaboration.
District 11
Unit 124
Steve Moese
0

#7 User is offline   MrAce 

  • VIP Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 6,971
  • Joined: 2009-November-14
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Houston, TX

Posted 2017-April-09, 15:02

PASS
"Genius has its own limitations, however stupidity has no such boundaries!"
"It's only when a mosquito lands on your testicles that you realize there is always a way to solve problems without using violence!"

"Well to be perfectly honest, in my humble opinion, of course without offending anyone who thinks differently from my point of view, but also by looking into this matter in a different perspective and without being condemning of one's view's and by trying to make it objectified, and by considering each and every one's valid opinion, I honestly believe that I completely forgot what I was going to say."
0

#8 User is offline   eagles123 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 1,831
  • Joined: 2011-June-08
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:UK Near London
  • Interests:Crystal Palace

Posted 2017-April-09, 15:49

SIX DIAMONDS

lol joke of course PASS
"definitely that's what I like to play when I'm playing standard - I want to be able to bid diamonds because bidding good suits is important in bridge" - Meckstroth's opinion on weak 2 diamond
1

#9 User is offline   mr1303 

  • Admirer of Walter the Walrus
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 2,563
  • Joined: 2003-November-14
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Ulaanbaatar, Mongolia
  • Interests:Bridge, surfing, water skiing, cricket, golf. Generally being outside really.

Posted 2017-April-11, 06:56

I'm red.

I pass.
0

#10 User is offline   rmnka447 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 2,366
  • Joined: 2012-March-18
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Illinois
  • Interests:Bridge, Golf, Soccer

Posted 2017-April-11, 12:07

I'm passing also. You've got a 5 loser hand and have no way to know if partner has any help. Down 2 Doubled or worse is an IMP disaster. Partner also rates to have some ♠ length. So defending might be right.
0

#11 User is offline   gszes 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 3,660
  • Joined: 2011-February-12

Posted 2017-April-17, 06:36

red vs white and unlimited (at worst invitational) lho and p failed to x 3c (an easy way to show some support even if weak). These warning signs are posted for a reason and if you should decide to test the waters anyway I sincerely hope you are not shocked when you get devoured by piranha (and dragging your poor innocent partner in with you).

Please pass and try to not lose the match on what possibly could be a part score hand.
0

#12 User is offline   Dinarius 

  • PipPipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 274
  • Joined: 2015-February-11
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Ireland

Posted 2017-April-18, 08:17

I PASS now.

But, I'm not sure about my first bid.

Realistically, I have only one bid.

So, I'd seriously consider 3♣ as my first bid.

I have considerable, but narrowly focused, playing strength.

It will take very little from Partner to make 9 tricks.

Any takers?

D.
0

#13 User is online   P_Marlowe 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 10,250
  • Joined: 2005-March-18
  • Gender:Male

Posted 2017-April-19, 08:17

Pass.

I may have bid 3C, but 2C is ok, now I am finished.
Do I really want to suggest to sac. against 4S?

With kind regards
Marlowe
With kind regards
Uwe Gebhardt (P_Marlowe)
0
Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users