Balance?
#1
Posted 2016-December-24, 05:15
Axx
Qxx
x
Axxxxx
LHO preempts 3D which is passed back to you... Now what? Agree w/ first pass?
Thanks...
#2
Posted 2016-December-24, 05:43
#3
Posted 2016-December-24, 06:15
I certainly double in protective seat, since I'm the one with short diamonds.
#4
Posted 2016-December-24, 06:35
definitely pass originally.
#5
Posted 2016-December-24, 10:38
wank, on 2016-December-24, 06:35, said:
Right that''s why I wasn't sure if X was so obvious. Partner had an unexciting 12-count with 44 majors sth like Kxxx Kxxx Axx Qx and felt he could cue after my passed hand balancing dbl (!),so I ended up (fortunately undoubled) in 4H-2. 3D was just -1.
But your answers make me feel better!
Thx and nice🎄
#6
Posted 2016-December-24, 12:41
The given hand was a case in point - though partner should have, of course, just settled for 3 of whichever major had the better spots.
ahydra
#7
Posted 2016-December-24, 13:02
apollo1201, on 2016-December-24, 05:15, said:
♠ A x x ♥ Q x x ♦ x ♣ A x x x x x
LHO preempts 3D which is passed back to you... Now what? Agree w/ first pass?
- Double = T/O but partner will often pass for penalties and you have good defence. Partner might play in a Moysian fit at the 3-level but should realise that you are bidding his cards. Protection denies an opening bid. It doesn't mean you've found an extra ace.
- Pass = NAT. Correct opposite a partner who has paid no attention to the auction. I suppose, however, you must have some sympathy for a partner with both majors who feels that finding the correct strain is as important as reaching the right level.
#8
Posted 2016-December-24, 13:25
apollo1201, on 2016-December-24, 10:38, said:
But your answers make me feel better!
Thx and nice🎄
if pard has a trap pass it's game over - bridge is a game of trust, if my partner passed in this position i would lose trust
#9
Posted 2016-December-25, 01:02
Supposing I ,hypothetically ,pass this hand then in the given auction,I will not be very happy ,yet, I will pass again.
#10
Posted 2016-December-25, 09:55
I'd double now, then get a new partner. Forcing to the four level on that hand is !
#12
Posted 2016-December-25, 14:31
#13
Posted 2016-December-25, 21:46
And, now I call Double because that is the obvious call.
I really don't see the problem here. Yes, it is risky to bid, but it is also quite risky to Pass! Partner clearly has some values and I have diamond shortness and support for the other 3 suits. Why would I not Double? Surely I would Double if LHO opened 3D in first chair and this were passed around to me - and then it would not be as clear that partner has some values as RHO might have a pretty good (minimum range opening) hand! Now, when it is clear partner has values and RHO does not opening values, it is much easier and safer to Double.
#14
Posted 2016-December-25, 23:32
GrahamJson, on 2016-December-25, 14:31, said:
Yes.I agree fully with your argument that how can those who consider the hand not worth opening at ONE level FORCE the partner to bid at THREE level.However ,I shall always open this hand 1Club.I don't bother about the so called rule of 20.Let us say a hand 10987,10987,AK,A76 11 plus 8 makes 19 .How many dare pass this hand as it does not satisfy rule of 20? That rule is an arbitrary and general guide line for those learning bridge (novices to early beginners).Perhaps they will suggest some modifications to that rule so that they can open this hand.
#15
Posted 2016-December-26, 06:59
Double now is auto.
"It's only when a mosquito lands on your testicles that you realize there is always a way to solve problems without using violence!"
"Well to be perfectly honest, in my humble opinion, of course without offending anyone who thinks differently from my point of view, but also by looking into this matter in a different perspective and without being condemning of one's view's and by trying to make it objectified, and by considering each and every one's valid opinion, I honestly believe that I completely forgot what I was going to say."
#16
Posted 2016-December-26, 08:49
msjennifer, on 2016-December-25, 23:32, said:
Your example has nothing to do with the Rule of 20. Three quick tricks and great intermediates in the majors makes your example an automatic opener. Rule of 20 is meant to apply more to hands like Q432 Q432 K2 A43, which should be passed.
#17
Posted 2016-December-26, 18:57
#18
Posted 2016-December-26, 18:58
#19
Posted 2016-December-26, 21:00
xxx Ax is far better opposite x KJxxx than P's actual holding. So, 3H is plenty
apollo1201, on 2016-December-24, 10:38, said:
But your answers make me feel better!
Thx and nice🎄
#20
Posted 2016-December-26, 23:25
Pass in 2d seat looks clear to me. If you open, you will go overboard way too often. If the hand gets passed out, you probably are going to break even in the long run.
A balancing X also looks right to me. You might actually have a major suit game.
Where I disagree with the other posters is with respect to your partner's action. In IMPS, I think he's right. You might as well get into the right strain at game rather than risk being in the wrong strain in a 3-level M contract. I would bid 4d in a flash. The fact that it doesn't work on this hand is immaterial.
Sometimes, things just don't work out so well. C'est la vie. It doesn't mean anyone did anything wrong.
Cheers,
Mike