Which opening (or pass)
#1
Posted 2016-November-20, 08:45
KQ9xx
x
Kx
QTxxx
What would you do? I opted for a brave 1S after toying with a weak 2 but I had already done it 3 deals before with KJTxx x xxx KJxx and didn't want my unknown partner to think I'd do this all the time.
Auction follows 1S-2H (not GF), 2S-3C (semi-natural, GF). Now what?
If you passed, you would face a simpler 1H-1S, 2C-? And if you opened 2S, partner probably tried 3H but could also leave you there in a nightmarish contract...
#2
Posted 2016-November-20, 08:56
apollo1201, on 2016-November-20, 08:45, said:
KQ9xx
x
Kx
QTxxx
What would you do? I opted for a brave 1S after toying with a weak 2 but I had already done it 3 deals before with KJTxx x xxx KJxx and didn't want my unknown partner to think I'd do this all the time.
Auction follows 1S-2H (not GF), 2S-3C (semi-natural, GF). Now what?
If you passed, you would face a simpler 1H-1S, 2C-? And if you opened 2S, partner probably tried 3H but could also leave you there in a nightmarish contract...
Opening or not depends on your style. Just don't open weak 2. Either pass or open 1.
I personally open very light but I would not open with this. I paid way too much for opening with aceless and less than genuine values.
If I passed and pd opened 1♥ and rebid 2♣, I would make 4th suit forcing planning to follow by 3 ♣ unless he shows 3 card ♠.
"It's only when a mosquito lands on your testicles that you realize there is always a way to solve problems without using violence!"
"Well to be perfectly honest, in my humble opinion, of course without offending anyone who thinks differently from my point of view, but also by looking into this matter in a different perspective and without being condemning of one's view's and by trying to make it objectified, and by considering each and every one's valid opinion, I honestly believe that I completely forgot what I was going to say."
#3
Posted 2016-November-20, 09:27
Different story if you reverse the majors but I can (almost) never be shut out on the next round with this shape.
What is baby oil made of?
#4
Posted 2016-November-20, 09:31
slam is still in the picture
#5
Posted 2016-November-20, 09:37
As others say, Pass then 2♦ is a great description of this hand.
Would consider 2♠ only in 3rd position after 2 passes. 1♠ in 1, 2 and 4.
Trust demands integrity, balance and collaboration.
District 11
Unit 124
Steve Moese
#6
Posted 2016-November-20, 11:15
#7
Posted 2016-November-20, 13:07
Change it to KQ9xx x xx KQ10xx and I'd have no problem opening it 1 ♠.
#8
Posted 2016-November-20, 14:12
Playing with my favourite partner, this is an easy (Lucas Two) 2 spade opening.
#9
Posted 2016-November-20, 14:19
After 1S-2H-2S-3C (game forcing) I would bid 5C since I use the principle of fast arrival in game forcing auctions. I don't think that one diamond stopper is likely to hold up in notrump when I'm so unlikely to have nine runners. If partner was making a strong slam try in hearts or spades, I hope he has a hand so strong that he can make 5 opposite this; but I don't see a call that describes my hand better.
#10
Posted 2016-November-20, 14:33
#11
Posted 2016-November-20, 16:02
#12
Posted 2016-November-20, 16:24
- A five loser hand
- Some defence
- A rebid
- A good major suit
What am I missing from an opening bid?
One problem with passing is that you might get the auction 1H - 1S; 2C and now it's not clear that 2D is artificial and forcing (can a passed hand really force to game?). This is natural and encouraging for many pairs, and if I bid 2D I might just wind up playing it there.
#13
Posted 2016-November-20, 16:46
sfi, on 2016-November-20, 16:24, said:
- A five loser hand
- Some defence
- A rebid
- A good major suit
What am I missing from an opening bid?
Plus, your rebid isn't all that awesome over 2 of a red suit, and partner isn't going to think too much of your defense if they have ♣AKxx(x)
Also, the LTC has an ace/queen adjustment?
#14
Posted 2016-November-20, 17:13
Kaitlyn S, on 2016-November-20, 16:46, said:
Plus, your rebid isn't all that awesome over 2 of a red suit, and partner isn't going to think too much of your defense if they have ♣AKxx(x)
Also, the LTC has an ace/queen adjustment?
Sorry, never heard of the rule of 20+2, but if it says I need 2 quick tricks to open it's simply misguided. It's easy to construct both balanced and unbalanced hands that are simply too good to pass.
This hand does have 1.5 quick tricks and a spare queen that isn't included in the count.
As to your other points:
- I'm not sure the LTC would downgrade either of these queens, given they have supporting honours and are in a five card suit. Even so, 6 losers is enough to accept an invite, let alone open the bidding.
- My rebid is exactly the same as any other 5/5 minimum opening hand would do, and partner will take that into account. After 2 of a red suit and 2S from me, I can bid 3C over 2NT or pass a rebid from partner. If partner bids clubs or raises spades I'm happy to take a shot at game. The only "bad" auction is 1S-2H; 2S-3D, where I have to bid 3NT. But it could easily be the right spot. Even if it isn't, there could easily be 9 tricks - they have to lead one of our suits after all.
- If partner has AKxx(x) of clubs, I'm not seeing too many auctions where we defend without mentioning the club suit - particularly where the auction would have gone better had I passed. I'm sure there are some, but they seem a pretty small subset. I still have my 1.5 defensive tricks you weren't impressed by, and the spades have a fair chance of being two tricks if I got a chance to mention them and partner doubled quickly anyway.
#15
Posted 2016-November-20, 17:21
What I would hate is to open this hand weak 2. This is a crime for me.
"It's only when a mosquito lands on your testicles that you realize there is always a way to solve problems without using violence!"
"Well to be perfectly honest, in my humble opinion, of course without offending anyone who thinks differently from my point of view, but also by looking into this matter in a different perspective and without being condemning of one's view's and by trying to make it objectified, and by considering each and every one's valid opinion, I honestly believe that I completely forgot what I was going to say."
#16
Posted 2016-November-21, 05:40
#18
Posted 2016-November-21, 12:31
There is a clear second bid - depending on systems used.
A pass might miss out on a valuable part-score, even if partner is weak.
#19
Posted 2016-November-21, 15:58
I would pass, both because (A) it's pretty easy to show this hand later on in most auctions and (B) if I open and partner has a 10-14 hand with no fit, we're going to get up too high.
Cheers,
Mike
#20
Posted 2016-November-21, 18:22