Pre-empted by opps and system
#1
Posted 2015-January-07, 09:36
#2
Posted 2015-January-07, 09:46
4♣ sounds like a fit jump for me so I can never show the clubs
#3
Posted 2015-January-07, 10:02
by the way, for those worried about end-playing partner when he's got no diamond stop, he has the option of passing freely as it's matchpoints.
#4
Posted 2015-January-07, 10:21
jillybean, on 2015-January-07, 09:46, said:
4♣ sounds like a fit jump for me so I can never show the clubs
Presumably you meant to say fit non-jump?
London UK
#5
Posted 2015-January-07, 10:49
#7
Posted 2015-January-07, 15:57
#8
Posted 2015-January-07, 16:48
whereagles, on 2015-January-07, 15:57, said:
That's not really where the emphasis lies. In ugly competitive auctions, responder tends to act quite light in the knowledge that he is facing extra strength or extra shape. Opener would not just reopen with 3NT just because he has a balance 16 count.
This applies to any standard system that uses a weak no trump - not just acol. Not that double is a perfect solution, but I think we have reached a level where it does not guarantee the other major.
#9
Posted 2015-January-07, 17:04
PhilKing, on 2015-January-07, 16:48, said:
This applies to any standard system that uses a weak no trump - not just acol. Not that double is a perfect solution, but I think we have reached a level where it does not guarantee the other major.
Why would opener need to reopen with 3NT? He can jolly well double!!!
wyman, on 2012-May-04, 09:48, said:
rbforster, on 2012-May-20, 21:04, said:
My YouTube Channel
#10
Posted 2015-January-07, 17:56
#13
Posted 2015-January-08, 05:32
Nothing is guaranteed to be right here. The pre-empt is very effective.
Pass is out of the question at pairs. Defending 3♦ is sure to be a poor score at pairs - if you can beat it by enough to score better than a part score in hearts or clubs then you could make game.
3♥ is incorrect playing 4 card majors. If partner has a good enough heart suit he will bid again.
4♣ describes the hand accurately but bypasses 3NT which is probably the right contract if partner has a strong NT type hand.
#14
Posted 2015-January-08, 16:34
cherdano, on 2015-January-07, 17:56, said:
It is a fairly easy double playing weak nt and maybe an equally easy pass playing strong nt (and 4-card majors). But maybe opener's response to such a light double is problematic. If he has a Flannery hand we get too high. If he has five hearts and four clubs we will be playing a silly 3♥ contract.
Then again, if we play strong notrump and pass with this hand, opener is under a lot of pressure.
#15
Posted 2015-January-09, 14:12
#16
Posted 2015-January-09, 14:20
keithhus, on 2015-January-09, 14:12, said:
I don't think you were told that you should never bid over their 3-level preempt with less than a 9-card fit. Maybe what your teacher said was that if you don't think you can make game and you don't think you have a nin-card fit, you should not bid over their 3-level preempt.
Here you have a hand that is strong enough to make game opposite a balanced 16-count, something which opener could easily have if you play Acol. Presumably, opener will do something if he has 19 points, so with 6-7 points you can pass. But with 9 points you should try to do something. Typically double.
#17
Posted 2015-January-09, 15:59
helene_t, on 2015-January-09, 14:20, said:
Here you have a hand that is strong enough to make game opposite a balanced 16-count, something which opener could easily have if you play Acol. Presumably, opener will do something if he has 19 points, so with 6-7 points you can pass. But with 9 points you should try to do something. Typically double.
Helena, thank you