Posted 2014-November-11, 10:41
1♦ 1♠
now what?
3♦ is inadequate. 2♥ is problematic when holding short spades..there is too much risk that partner will insist on hearts. Faking the major suit reverse is best reserved for hands on which one has 3 spades, since if partner 'insists' on hearts, he has 5+ spades
4♦ for me, and many, shows 4=6 with 4 spades
I think we are left with 3N, which is traditionally played as running diamonds and outside stuff, short in spades. This would be easy with, say, x Kxx AKQxxxx Ax, and our hand isn't a lot away from that.
After 3N, responder has an incredible hand. Assuming partner has the heart Q and the club A and 7 diamonds, he can count 13 tricks with the heart 10 in reserve.
I think 5♣ over 3N is commonly played as super-gerber, so that's what I'd do just to make sure we aren't missing an Ace.
At worst partner has x Qxx AKQJxx Axx. and that is very borderline for 3N, and has decent play for the grand.
Now, at imps one might consider choosing 7♦ on the notion that a bad break (assuming AKQxxxx) would mean failing by fewer tricks than in 7N, but that would require a spade lead as well as bad breaks and I think the combination isn't worth the 2 imps we lose against 7N, assuming they reach grand at the other table.
I appreciate that we have had threads in which some very good players have suggested that reserving 3N for this use is unduly restrictive, but it is still the way I like to play it, and it is nice to see an example of where the method works well.
'one of the great markers of the advance of human kindness is the howls you will hear from the Men of God' Johann Hari