Brown sticker or not quick query
#1
Posted 2014-June-03, 01:52
2D opening:
a) 21/22 HCP balanced or
b) 9-13 HCP and at least 5/5 in one of the following options:
- spades and clubs
- diamonds and hearts (with better diamonds)
- hearts and spades (with better hearts)
2H opening
9-15 HCP 5+hearts, 5+ minor (when diamonds, then it will have better hearts)
2S opening
8-15HCP 5+spades, 5+ diamonds/hearts
As for the responses to the above, it is HCP-based step responses, and yes, he is obsessed with finding out about HCP before learning more about shape.
#2
Posted 2014-June-03, 02:22
#3
Posted 2014-June-03, 02:53
My feeling is that the WBF is very focused on HCP, given the definitions of 'Weak' and 'Strong', and its intent is to disregard distributional values from definitions - I may be wrong.
So my view is that 2♦ is a Brown Sticker convention and the 2M openers are not. By changing the range of the weaker options to 10-13 HCP, then 2♦ would not be a Brown Sticker convention.
In terms of the EBU, the 2M openers are Level 2. The 2♦ opener looks like it would be Level 5 as long as it is not a Brown Sticker convention so personally I don't think it will be permitted in EBU events although one of EBU directors or L&EC members on the forum are far better qualified to comment.
#4
Posted 2014-June-03, 03:05
#5
Posted 2014-June-03, 07:27
It is also a BSC and hence only EBU-legal at level 5 or in WBF events when these are permitted (i.e. not very many)
If it were 10+ hcp it would be allowed at L5
#6
Posted 2014-June-03, 08:32
FrancesHinden, on 2014-June-03, 07:27, said:
Brown Sticker conventions are not permitted at EBU Level 5 (unless they are permitted at Level 4) as they are not permitted in WBF/EBL Category 3 events.
#7
Posted 2014-June-03, 09:17
FrancesHinden, on 2014-June-03, 07:27, said:
It is also a BSC and hence only EBU-legal at level 5 or in WBF events when these are permitted (i.e. not very many)
If it were 10+ hcp it would be allowed at L5
paulg, on 2014-June-03, 08:32, said:
Frances' last line suggests she meant to write something different on the previous line.
"Robin Barker is a mathematician. ... All highly skilled in their respective fields and clearly accomplished bridge players."
#8
Posted 2014-June-03, 14:10
#9
Posted 2014-June-03, 15:44
paulg, on 2014-June-03, 02:53, said:
Obviously it cannot according to the WBFLC regulation. If "no distributional values" is not clear enough, the absence of "or compensating distribution" should erase any doubt.
But the regulation was presumably written by the WBFLC, so I suppose one can never be entirely sure.
#10
Posted 2014-June-03, 17:03
I would accept the verdict of a qualified grammarian that I'm wrong. Or, perhaps, of the WBF committee responsible for the regulation, though in the latter case I would suggest to them that they need to rethink the wording.
As for tv, screw it. You aren't missing anything. -- Ken Berg
I have come to realise it is futile to expect or hope a regular club game will be run in accordance with the laws. -- Jillybean
#12
Posted 2014-June-16, 01:51
I told him last Monday that he wouldn't be allowed to play that convention. He replied that whenever he made it up, he had extensively checked the orange book to make sure it was legal and he felt that based on reading it that it was allowed. Not really knowing what to say to that, I nicely told him to check it again since it changes every year (though highly suspecting it hasn't been legal in at least a decade) and told him about the similarities to Wilkozc 2D, so he agreed to check again. When we met up again on Thursday, he told me that the only thing that was wrong with the 2D opening was that you couldn't call a 13 count weak and so he wanted to change the range to 8-12. I plan on printing out various parts of the blue book today to try and show him that he can't. Looking at the blue book pdf, I'm guessing it's 7C1 that covers the issue. From what I gather, he was planning to get it through by essentially calling it a multi [8C2(a)2].
#13
Posted 2014-June-16, 02:06
#14
Posted 2014-June-16, 02:41
#15
Posted 2014-June-16, 02:52
OTOH there are other conventions which are OK at EBU level 4 although they are BSC: You can play any multi-like opening such as for example 2♣ as showing a 5-card in a red suit.
#16
Posted 2014-June-16, 05:38
manudude03, on 2014-June-16, 02:41, said:
The EBU permits a wide variety of two- and three-level opening bids at Level 4 (which is what most clubs will play), many of which are Brown Sticker conventions. This reflects a basic difference in philosophy between the EBU and WBF: the EBU permits almost any opening that either promises or denies the suit opened which allows the meaning of double to be fairly clear; the WBF insists that all the weak options guarantee 4+ cards in a specific suit.
So common BSCs permitted by the EBU include a 2♠ or 2NT opener showing a pre-empt in a minor and 3♦ as a major-suit pre-empt.
#17
Posted 2014-June-16, 06:07
EBU Blue book 8C2 said:
options.
(a) Weak option
A defined range of no more than 5 HCP, a minimum strength of 4 HCP and a maximum
of 12 HCP. The agreed strength may differ according to position and/or vulnerability.
The suit may be played as either (i) 5+ hearts; or (ii) 5+ hearts or 5+ spades
or is the above only for single-suited hands?
edit: The clubs I play at use the "old" level 3.
#18
Posted 2014-June-16, 06:14
manudude03, on 2014-June-16, 06:07, said:
7 C 1 (b) (iv) 2 allows two-suited hands as long as neither of the two suits is the suit opened, in this case diamonds.