Help
Vul vs NV, Imps. 1♦=4+ (Oppo are playing Acol with 4M, 12-14NT)
Page 1 of 1
Response to a TO x after intervention
#1
- Group: Advanced Members
- Posts: 1,627
- Joined: 2009-November-30
- Location:Oxfordshire, England
Posted 2014-April-16, 10:29
Vul vs NV, Imps. 1♦=4+ (Oppo are playing Acol with 4M, 12-14NT)
#2
- The Abbess
-
- Group: Advanced Members
- Posts: 17,196
- Joined: 2004-April-22
- Gender:Female
- Location:UK
Posted 2014-April-16, 10:38
Dbl is a reasonable alternative imo
The world would be such a happy place, if only everyone played Acol :) --- TramTicket
#3
- Group: Advanced Members
- Posts: 7,786
- Joined: 2004-September-05
- Gender:Male
- Location:Galloway NJ USA
-
Interests:Bridge, Poker, participatory and spectator sports.
Occupation - Tax Attorney in Atlantic City, NJ.
Posted 2014-April-16, 11:28
Normally I would like to bid my major, but the sixth club sways me to bid clubs.
I am not doubling the opps in an 8+ card fit at the four level when there is a good chance that we have an 8 card heart fit and a 10 card club fit.
I am not doubling the opps in an 8+ card fit at the four level when there is a good chance that we have an 8 card heart fit and a 10 card club fit.
#4
- Group: Advanced Members
- Posts: 14,900
- Joined: 2004-May-11
- Gender:Male
- Location:Portugal
- Interests:Everything!
Posted 2014-April-16, 14:16
5♥. I might need the clubs to discard diamonds.
Note also that pard is favourite to have only 3 spades, making it more likely he has 4 hearts.
Note also that pard is favourite to have only 3 spades, making it more likely he has 4 hearts.
#5
- Group: Advanced Members
- Posts: 13,006
- Joined: 2005-June-15
- Gender:Male
- Location:Canada
- Interests:Bridge, golf, wine (red), cooking, reading eclectically but insatiably, travelling, making bad posts.
Posted 2014-April-16, 21:45
I think it close between double and 5♣ and choose the latter because there is, imo, too much chance that they are cold. My diamonds are probably a negative value on defence and declarer will have no trouble picking up spades if he needs to, since partner's takeout double tells him where the defensive spade cards are.
meanwhile, I might be able to make game.
I reject hearts. There is too much danger of having an inadequate fit and/or a bad break. They probably can't double 5♣ when it is down, but may well be able to double 5♥, and 500 red v white is going to be ugly when it's wrong.
meanwhile, I might be able to make game.
I reject hearts. There is too much danger of having an inadequate fit and/or a bad break. They probably can't double 5♣ when it is down, but may well be able to double 5♥, and 500 red v white is going to be ugly when it's wrong.
'one of the great markers of the advance of human kindness is the howls you will hear from the Men of God' Johann Hari
#6
- Group: Full Members
- Posts: 781
- Joined: 2012-January-31
- Gender:Male
Posted 2014-April-17, 14:11
True the stack is in front of him not behind him--but are they really making 4♠? And are you really making anything above that?
There is a big difference between a good decision and a good result. Let's keep our posts about good decisions rather than "gotcha" results!
#7
- Group: Advanced Members
- Posts: 13,006
- Joined: 2005-June-15
- Gender:Male
- Location:Canada
- Interests:Bridge, golf, wine (red), cooking, reading eclectically but insatiably, travelling, making bad posts.
Posted 2014-April-17, 17:12
HighLow21, on 2014-April-17, 14:11, said:
True the stack is in front of him not behind him--but are they really making 4♠? And are you really making anything above that?
Tell me what is wrong with this layout? Note they make slam once N doubles at the 1-level. Not often we see a red v white save
It took 30 seconds to come up with this layout, only because I am a slow keyboarder.
'one of the great markers of the advance of human kindness is the howls you will hear from the Men of God' Johann Hari
#8
- Group: Advanced Members
- Posts: 2,366
- Joined: 2012-March-18
- Gender:Male
- Location:Illinois
- Interests:Bridge, Golf, Soccer
Posted 2014-April-18, 11:56
I'm bidding 5 ♣.
Partner has advertised shortness in ♦. With my doubleton, it sure looks like the opponents have at least a 9 card secondary ♦ fit. Defensive prospects don't look too good with my ♦ KJ sitting in front of opener.
Unless partner has made a funny T/O double, there is at least a 9 card ♣ fit between our hands. If doubler has the big ♥ overcall hand and can't stand ♣, we'll be OK if 5 ♥ is bid. If I bid 5 ♥, it could get gruesome if doubler shows up with 3 ♥ and the opponents play a forcing defense by continually leading ♠s.
Partner has advertised shortness in ♦. With my doubleton, it sure looks like the opponents have at least a 9 card secondary ♦ fit. Defensive prospects don't look too good with my ♦ KJ sitting in front of opener.
Unless partner has made a funny T/O double, there is at least a 9 card ♣ fit between our hands. If doubler has the big ♥ overcall hand and can't stand ♣, we'll be OK if 5 ♥ is bid. If I bid 5 ♥, it could get gruesome if doubler shows up with 3 ♥ and the opponents play a forcing defense by continually leading ♠s.
Page 1 of 1