Hum.. so I see this level 2 jump-shift is not consensual. I think both sides have a good case... lol.
How forcing is this?
#22
Posted 2005-February-01, 18:13
Double !, on Feb 1 2005, 12:43 AM, said:
What would you rebid after opening 1♣ -p-1♥-p-? holding the following:
♠Axx,♥x,xx,♣AKQxxxx ? (.....hope that adds up to 13 cards)
♠Axx,♥x,xx,♣AKQxxxx ? (.....hope that adds up to 13 cards)
What wouldn't you rebid?: 2♠.
2♠ is not a reverse but jump shift, you can safelly bid 1♠ with 15-18.
#23 Guest_Jlall_*
Posted 2005-February-01, 18:50
fred, on Jan 31 2005, 06:32 PM, said:
If you want to play your jump shifts as one round forces that's up to you, but I strongly suggest you discuss this with your partner. Jeff Rubens, the editor of The Bridge World, has been campaigning to make jump shifts only forcing for 1 round in "Bridge World Standard", but as far as I can tell few if any of the world's leading players are jumping on this particular bandwagon.
Fred Gitelman
Bridge Base Inc.
www.bridgebase.com
Fred Gitelman
Bridge Base Inc.
www.bridgebase.com
Interesting. I do not like this idea. Slam bidding and finding the right strain etc should not be hindered by having the ability to stop on a dime in 4 of a minor or 3 of a major. I like jumpshifts to be full game forces for the same reason I prefer 2/1 game forcing to SAYC. But, Rubens has always been ahead of his time, maybe in 5 years I will be advocating this approach
#24
Posted 2005-February-02, 11:27
I play this as 100% gameforcing. The 2NT Lebensohl treatment here would still be useful though!
Please note: I am interested in boring, bog standard, 2/1.
- hrothgar
- hrothgar

Help
