BBO Discussion Forums: Three or Four - BBO Discussion Forums

Jump to content

Page 1 of 1

Three or Four Hearts

Poll: Three or Four (19 member(s) have cast votes)

Three Hearts or Four

  1. Obvious Three Hearts (12 votes [63.16%] - View)

    Percentage of vote: 63.16%

  2. Close But Three Hearts (7 votes [36.84%] - View)

    Percentage of vote: 36.84%

  3. Close But Four Hearts (0 votes [0.00%])

    Percentage of vote: 0.00%

  4. Obvious Four Hearts (0 votes [0.00%])

    Percentage of vote: 0.00%

Vote Guests cannot vote

#1 User is offline   eagles123 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 1,831
  • Joined: 2011-June-08
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:UK Near London
  • Interests:Crystal Palace

Posted 2013-November-18, 12:12



Matchpoints

so what here, 3 hearts or 4 hearts?

Thanks,

Eagles
"definitely that's what I like to play when I'm playing standard - I want to be able to bid diamonds because bidding good suits is important in bridge" - Meckstroth's opinion on weak 2 diamond
1

#2 User is offline   ArtK78 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 7,786
  • Joined: 2004-September-05
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Galloway NJ USA
  • Interests:Bridge, Poker, participatory and spectator sports.
    Occupation - Tax Attorney in Atlantic City, NJ.

Posted 2013-November-18, 12:49

View Posteagles123, on 2013-November-18, 12:12, said:



so what here, 3 hearts or 4 hearts?

Thanks,

Eagles

And the correct answer is: YES!

Seriously, I would bid 3, but I would not criticize anyone who would bid 4.

By loser count, you have a 6 loser hand, which is not always worth a jump to 3. But this hand has a lot of very good aspects, and the presence of the K cannot be ignored. The K might be worthless or it might be useful - we don't know yet. But the hand would be the same 6 losers even if the K were the 2.

I would prefer a slightly better heart suit, but it is not terrible. KJTxxx is a lot better than KJxxxx.
0

#3 User is online   Cyberyeti 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 14,217
  • Joined: 2009-July-13
  • Location:England

Posted 2013-November-18, 12:54

System ? how many hearts have you shown by 1 ? If 4 how freely do you raise on 3 ?

I'm wondering whether rebidding hearts is in fact correct here, partner has no more than 3/2 and may be shorter than that particularly in hearts, there are plenty of hands where you actually want to be in a minor here or NT, try Axx, x, xxx, QJxxxx or xxx, void, KQxxxx, QJxx for examples.

Form of scoring ? Are you playing weak jump shifts ?
0

#4 User is offline   eagles123 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 1,831
  • Joined: 2011-June-08
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:UK Near London
  • Interests:Crystal Palace

Posted 2013-November-18, 13:00

View PostCyberyeti, on 2013-November-18, 12:54, said:

System ? how many hearts have you shown by 1 ? If 4 how freely do you raise on 3 ?

I'm wondering whether rebidding hearts is in fact correct here, partner has no more than 3/2 and may be shorter than that particularly in hearts, there are plenty of hands where you actually want to be in a minor here or NT, try Axx, x, xxx, QJxxxx or xxx, void, KQxxxx, QJxx for examples.

Form of scoring ? Are you playing weak jump shifts ?


It was matchpoints,

system is Acol so 1H opening shows 4+ probably raise on 3 with either a side singleton or two doubletons but 3343 or 2344 would always be 1N if in the right points

don't play weak jump shifts, no.
"definitely that's what I like to play when I'm playing standard - I want to be able to bid diamonds because bidding good suits is important in bridge" - Meckstroth's opinion on weak 2 diamond
1

#5 User is offline   billw55 

  • enigmatic
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 4,757
  • Joined: 2009-July-31
  • Gender:Male

Posted 2013-November-18, 13:25

View PostArtK78, on 2013-November-18, 12:49, said:

I would bid 3, but I would not criticize anyone who would bid 4.

Pretty much same. I just want to allow for partner holding a bad hand with a stiff heart, where he is cornered into bidding 1NT.

I wonder how much I can infer from ops failure to bid spades.
Life is long and beautiful, if bad things happen, good things will follow.
-gwnn
0

#6 User is offline   ggwhiz 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 3,952
  • Joined: 2008-June-23
  • Gender:Male

Posted 2013-November-18, 13:34

3 I am not at all unhappy if pard bids 3nt with reason to believe 1 or both of their minor suits will run.
When a deaf person goes to court is it still called a hearing?
What is baby oil made of?
0

#7 User is offline   neilkaz 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 3,568
  • Joined: 2006-June-28
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Barrington IL USA
  • Interests:Backgammon, Bridge, Hockey

Posted 2013-November-18, 13:42

Obvious 3 for me as this stiff K is a downgrade and my suit is only 6 and not that strong.

I'd feel better about 4 if a small were the 9, but still would bid 3.
0

#8 User is online   Cyberyeti 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 14,217
  • Joined: 2009-July-13
  • Location:England

Posted 2013-November-18, 13:44

View Posteagles123, on 2013-November-18, 13:00, said:

It was matchpoints,

system is Acol so 1H opening shows 4+ probably raise on 3 with either a side singleton or two doubletons but 3343 or 2344 would always be 1N if in the right points

don't play weak jump shifts, no.


In that case probably 3, in a 5M system I'd seriously consider bidding a minor.
0

#9 User is offline   cherdano 

  • 5555
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 9,519
  • Joined: 2003-September-04
  • Gender:Male

Posted 2013-November-18, 14:31

3, and I would criticize anyone who bids 4.

P.S.: I wrote this before realizing which forum this was posted in. If a beginner would bid 4, I would ask him or her why they bid it. If they said that despite 18 hcp, this hand has a nice 6-card suit and is full of aces and kings, I would agree that it's worth upgrading hands full of aces and kings, and with a 6-card major. And explain that on the other hand, the K is a negative feature, and that the suit isn't that great opposite a singleton, etc.
The easiest way to count losers is to line up the people who talk about loser count, and count them. -Kieran Dyke
4

#10 User is offline   gszes 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 3,660
  • Joined: 2011-February-12

Posted 2013-November-18, 17:35

we have a 7 trick hand which will be a 9 trick hand opposite most minimums and a
10 trick hand opposite darn few minimums. Since this is MP there is no real reason to
push to a low % probability game here so we settle for a 3h invite which should be well
over 50% if p can accept. It is not always about HCP sometimes simply counting tricks
will solve an enormous amount of your rebid problems.
0

#11 User is offline   eagles123 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 1,831
  • Joined: 2011-June-08
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:UK Near London
  • Interests:Crystal Palace

Posted 2013-November-19, 04:53

thanks everyone :)
"definitely that's what I like to play when I'm playing standard - I want to be able to bid diamonds because bidding good suits is important in bridge" - Meckstroth's opinion on weak 2 diamond
1

#12 User is offline   Thiros 

  • PipPipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 130
  • Joined: 2012-September-08
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:California Commonwealth
  • Interests:Greek fire, Damascus steel, Linear A

Posted 2013-November-21, 02:09

3 would be my choice, but at matchpoints a raise to 2NT has some merit to it. The spade situation is risky, but you'll only get blown away in the suit if partner has nothing there, RHO leads a spade and LHO has the A. And even then, partner has the option to go back to hearts with a strong doubleton. I'd want to be in 3NT if partner had J10x x KQxx QJxxx.
1

Page 1 of 1


Fast Reply

  

4 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 4 guests, 0 anonymous users