Help
Our system:
- 1NT: Non-forcing
- 3♦: 6c♦; intermediate
- 2♦ followed by 3♦: GF
...Or if you prefer: how do you bid this hand with your system?
Page 1 of 1
Good Diamonds and nothing else
#1
- Group: Advanced Members
- Posts: 3,432
- Joined: 2003-April-11
Posted 2013-September-11, 09:08
MP's
Our system:
- 1NT: Non-forcing
- 3♦: 6c♦; intermediate
- 2♦ followed by 3♦: GF
...Or if you prefer: how do you bid this hand with your system?
Our system:
- 1NT: Non-forcing
- 3♦: 6c♦; intermediate
- 2♦ followed by 3♦: GF
...Or if you prefer: how do you bid this hand with your system?
#2
- Group: Advanced Members
- Posts: 16,826
- Joined: 2003-October-07
- Gender:Male
Posted 2013-September-11, 09:15
3d
--
we would start with a sf 1nt if pard does not pass that then rebid 3d.
--
we would start with a sf 1nt if pard does not pass that then rebid 3d.
#3
- Group: Advanced Members
- Posts: 3,568
- Joined: 2006-June-28
- Gender:Male
- Location:Barrington IL USA
- Interests:Backgammon, Bridge, Hockey
Posted 2013-September-11, 09:20
I'm forcing to game and would be surprised if a sim showed that some game isn't a favorite.
However, many 2/1ers can pass it out at 4D if opener is min and has no fit.
However, many 2/1ers can pass it out at 4D if opener is min and has no fit.
#4
- Group: Full Members
- Posts: 375
- Joined: 2011-April-12
Posted 2013-September-11, 09:37
I agree. I'd bid 2♦.
#5
- VIP Member
-
- Group: Advanced Members
- Posts: 6,971
- Joined: 2009-November-14
- Gender:Male
- Location:Houston, TX
Posted 2013-September-11, 16:31
kgr, on 2013-September-11, 09:08, said:
MP's
Our system:
- 1NT: Non-forcing
- 3♦: 6c♦; intermediate
- 2♦ followed by 3♦: GF
...Or if you prefer: how do you bid this hand with your system?
Our system:
- 1NT: Non-forcing
- 3♦: 6c♦; intermediate
- 2♦ followed by 3♦: GF
...Or if you prefer: how do you bid this hand with your system?
You seem to play same system i do on that matter.
I would definitely force to game at IMPs. But MP it is kinda borderline, but knowing myself with 7 tricks in hand (unless pd is void in diamonds) i would probably go for game bonus even at MP. Just do everything you can to let pd be the declarer in 3NT.
"Genius has its own limitations, however stupidity has no such boundaries!"
"It's only when a mosquito lands on your testicles that you realize there is always a way to solve problems without using violence!"
"Well to be perfectly honest, in my humble opinion, of course without offending anyone who thinks differently from my point of view, but also by looking into this matter in a different perspective and without being condemning of one's view's and by trying to make it objectified, and by considering each and every one's valid opinion, I honestly believe that I completely forgot what I was going to say."
"It's only when a mosquito lands on your testicles that you realize there is always a way to solve problems without using violence!"
"Well to be perfectly honest, in my humble opinion, of course without offending anyone who thinks differently from my point of view, but also by looking into this matter in a different perspective and without being condemning of one's view's and by trying to make it objectified, and by considering each and every one's valid opinion, I honestly believe that I completely forgot what I was going to say."
#6
- Group: Advanced Members
- Posts: 3,432
- Joined: 2003-April-11
Posted 2013-September-12, 09:58
Thank you for the answers. Seems that there is some preference for forcing to game.
The complete deal and result:
MP's
- 3♦: 6c♦; intermediate
3♦+1
Score: 37%
(When we played the deal 3 other pairs were in 3NT making.)
The complete deal and result:
MP's
- 3♦: 6c♦; intermediate
3♦+1
Score: 37%
(When we played the deal 3 other pairs were in 3NT making.)
#7
- VIP Member
-
- Group: Advanced Members
- Posts: 6,971
- Joined: 2009-November-14
- Gender:Male
- Location:Houston, TX
Posted 2013-September-12, 11:26
kgr, on 2013-September-12, 09:58, said:
Thank you for the answers. Seems that there is some preference for forcing to game.
The complete deal and result:
MP's
- 3♦: 6c♦; intermediate
3♦+1
Score: 37%
(When we played the deal 3 other pairs were in 3NT making.)
The complete deal and result:
MP's
- 3♦: 6c♦; intermediate
3♦+1
Score: 37%
(When we played the deal 3 other pairs were in 3NT making.)
3 NT seems like going down on ♣ lead 3♣+2 major aces, still worth a shot at IMPs but i don't think you should feel bad for playing 3 ♦ at MP. Hearts and diamonds will be bid by your side and they are likely to find ♣ lead when they hold 8 clubs and 7 spades vs 3 NT. You could as well receive a good zero had you bid 3 NT, on a ♣ lead. Or you could be the one getting % 70 when we get % 25 if people had an easier ♣ lead vs 3 NT.
"Genius has its own limitations, however stupidity has no such boundaries!"
"It's only when a mosquito lands on your testicles that you realize there is always a way to solve problems without using violence!"
"Well to be perfectly honest, in my humble opinion, of course without offending anyone who thinks differently from my point of view, but also by looking into this matter in a different perspective and without being condemning of one's view's and by trying to make it objectified, and by considering each and every one's valid opinion, I honestly believe that I completely forgot what I was going to say."
"It's only when a mosquito lands on your testicles that you realize there is always a way to solve problems without using violence!"
"Well to be perfectly honest, in my humble opinion, of course without offending anyone who thinks differently from my point of view, but also by looking into this matter in a different perspective and without being condemning of one's view's and by trying to make it objectified, and by considering each and every one's valid opinion, I honestly believe that I completely forgot what I was going to say."
Page 1 of 1