Help
IMPs, vul. vs. not, you deal and open a 16+ 1♣:
AKJ9x Txx Ax AQ9
1♣ - (2♦) - P* - (3♦) - ?
2♦ was natural and ostensibly weak. Pard's P denied a takeout shape with 6(5)+ HCPs, a balanced GF hand, a GF with a 5+ card suit, or 6+ card major suit with semi-positive+ suit strength.
What's your bid?
Page 1 of 1
Bid or go out quietly?
#1
- Group: Advanced Members
- Posts: 1,261
- Joined: 2005-September-04
- Gender:Male
Posted 2013-March-14, 12:19
foobar on BBO
#2
- Group: Advanced Members
- Posts: 7,786
- Joined: 2004-September-05
- Gender:Male
- Location:Galloway NJ USA
-
Interests:Bridge, Poker, participatory and spectator sports.
Occupation - Tax Attorney in Atlantic City, NJ.
Posted 2013-March-14, 12:51
Pass.
#3
- Group: Advanced Members
- Posts: 16,739
- Joined: 2003-October-07
- Gender:Male
Posted 2013-March-14, 13:59
pass,
x or 3s should be more than 16-18 bal.
pass will very often show roughly 16-18 bal.
pard is allowed to balance.
x or 3s should be more than 16-18 bal.
pass will very often show roughly 16-18 bal.
pard is allowed to balance.
#4
- Group: Advanced Members
- Posts: 12,866
- Joined: 2005-June-15
- Gender:Male
- Location:Canada
- Interests:Bridge, golf, wine (red), cooking, reading eclectically but insatiably, travelling, making bad posts.
Posted 2013-March-14, 17:38
Pass seems obvious. Partner is still there and can balance (usually with a double) quite freely, having limited his hand. We may miss an occasional partscore but we shouldn't be missing many games if he is unable to do anything.
I'd need an extra spade to consider bidding 3♠, longer hearts to consider doubling, and a much better hand to consider 3N.
Btw, the title is misleading: passing in this situation is not surrendering or 'going out quietly'. It is making a normal call in an action that is still alive after our pass.
Partner is the one who will likely have the 'bid or go out quietly' choice
I'd need an extra spade to consider bidding 3♠, longer hearts to consider doubling, and a much better hand to consider 3N.
Btw, the title is misleading: passing in this situation is not surrendering or 'going out quietly'. It is making a normal call in an action that is still alive after our pass.
Partner is the one who will likely have the 'bid or go out quietly' choice
'one of the great markers of the advance of human kindness is the howls you will hear from the Men of God' Johann Hari
#5
- Group: Advanced Members
- Posts: 6,373
- Joined: 2003-March-15
- Location:Hamburg, Germany
- Interests:games and sports, esp. bridge,chess and (beach-)volleyball
Posted 2013-March-15, 01:54
I guess I need to bid in a polish style, but I am very happy to play prec. for this board.
Kind Regards
Roland
Sanity Check: Failure (Fluffy)
More system is not the answer...
Roland
Sanity Check: Failure (Fluffy)
More system is not the answer...
#6
- mmm Duvel
-
- Group: Advanced Members
- Posts: 10,728
- Joined: 2003-July-30
- Gender:Male
- Location:Belgium
- Interests:Duvel, Whisky
Posted 2013-March-15, 04:16
It's difficult to have discipline on this sort of hands, but I'd pass. Partner doesn't rate to have a useful hand (he must be short in ♦ but didn't have any bid available). For the record, Dbl is imo slightly better than 3♠.
"It may be rude to leave to go to the bathroom, but it's downright stupid to sit there and piss yourself" - blackshoe
#7
- Group: Advanced Members
- Posts: 2,211
- Joined: 2006-April-22
Posted 2013-March-15, 06:55
1♣ - (2♦) - P* - (3♦) - ?
2♦ was natural and ostensibly weak. Pard's P denied a takeout shape with 6(5)+ HCPs, a balanced GF hand, a GF with a 5+ card suit, or 6+ card major suit with semi-positive+ suit strength.
*** As I play P* as Spades-not-misfit, (X= not Sxxx+, SJx+),
NOT bidding 3S denies 5+S, my bid is 3S.
2♦ was natural and ostensibly weak. Pard's P denied a takeout shape with 6(5)+ HCPs, a balanced GF hand, a GF with a 5+ card suit, or 6+ card major suit with semi-positive+ suit strength.
*** As I play P* as Spades-not-misfit, (X= not Sxxx+, SJx+),
NOT bidding 3S denies 5+S, my bid is 3S.
#8
- Group: Advanced Members
- Posts: 1,261
- Joined: 2005-September-04
- Gender:Male
Posted 2013-March-18, 10:06
Thanks for the feedback.
On this hand, the opps played in 3♦ in their 9 card fit, making.
Pard had a near yard with 5-4 in the majors and 3♠ makes as well.
On this hand, the opps played in 3♦ in their 9 card fit, making.
Pard had a near yard with 5-4 in the majors and 3♠ makes as well.
foobar on BBO
#9
- Group: Advanced Members
- Posts: 4,071
- Joined: 2009-January-18
- Gender:Male
- Location:Vancouver WA USA
Posted 2013-March-18, 12:14
akhare, on 2013-March-18, 10:06, said:
Thanks for the feedback.
On this hand, the opps played in 3♦ in their 9 card fit, making.
Pard had a near yard with 5-4 in the majors and 3♠ makes as well.
On this hand, the opps played in 3♦ in their 9 card fit, making.
Pard had a near yard with 5-4 in the majors and 3♠ makes as well.
Seems like it would have made 4S although I may have misremembered.
I think opener should act with a minimum and shortness but not minimums and balanced hands...unless holding a 6-cd major. I'd guess that this hand is close to acting but I'd rather reserve a direct bid here for something better...basically to empower responder to raise with more hands. This will lose out sometimes, but it won't allow the opponents to goad us into unmakeable games over and over again.
After P P responder might be able to balanced with 3H and hearts could be our best fit. If responder balances with double, it ought to be penalty. This is the same situation as after an opening 2D P 3D P P dbl which is also penalty. Basically, if responder has takeout shape and like 5+ hcps, he needs to double 2D immediately.
Page 1 of 1