Page 1 of 1
Another nice hand JEC#30
#2
Posted 2013-January-19, 18:16
Would have bid 4♥ instead of X.
"One of the painful things about our time is that those who feel certainty are stupid, and those with any imagination and understanding are filled with doubt and indecision"
-- Bertrand Russell
-- Bertrand Russell
#3
Posted 2013-January-19, 18:24
A very tough one...prefer 4c not x
given OP I will try 4c now but very tough one.
given OP I will try 4c now but very tough one.
#4
Posted 2013-January-19, 19:17
Maybe 4C should be a cuebid but I don't want to risk some accident. I'll just bid 4D and then 5C, that should get the message across.
blogging at http://www.justinlall.com
#5
Posted 2013-January-20, 12:47
4 ♦ for now...
Kind Regards
Roland
Sanity Check: Failure (Fluffy)
More system is not the answer...
Roland
Sanity Check: Failure (Fluffy)
More system is not the answer...
#6
Posted 2013-January-22, 10:14
4c
has to be a cue bid searching for dia slam--i showed my suit surely i do not
wish to play in a suit where one of the opps has 5 of them--take advantage
of the space the opps give you.
has to be a cue bid searching for dia slam--i showed my suit surely i do not
wish to play in a suit where one of the opps has 5 of them--take advantage
of the space the opps give you.
#7
Posted 2013-January-24, 06:09
I would bid 5♣ as void showing splinter, but I supose you play exclusion so it is not avaible.
So 4♣ by now, maybe a 5♣ rebid is taken as void, maybe it is taken as natural, with all those kibitzers I don't know if I would bid it ever.
So 4♣ by now, maybe a 5♣ rebid is taken as void, maybe it is taken as natural, with all those kibitzers I don't know if I would bid it ever.
#8
Posted 2013-January-24, 06:33
mgoetze, on 2013-January-19, 18:16, said:
Would have bid 4♥ instead of X.
Why would you show a 65 hand when you have a 74 hand?
The easiest way to count losers is to line up the people who talk about loser count, and count them. -Kieran Dyke
#9
Posted 2013-January-24, 11:06
cherdano, on 2013-January-24, 06:33, said:
Why would you show a 65 hand when you have a 74 hand?
I am not quite convinced that it shows 65; in any case I would be worried that partner might pass my double, though perhaps that is irrational.
"One of the painful things about our time is that those who feel certainty are stupid, and those with any imagination and understanding are filled with doubt and indecision"
-- Bertrand Russell
-- Bertrand Russell
#10
Posted 2013-January-24, 17:53
Fluffy, on 2013-January-24, 06:09, said:
I would bid 5♣ as void showing splinter, but I supose you play exclusion so it is not avaible.
So 4♣ by now, maybe a 5♣ rebid is taken as void, maybe it is taken as natural, with all those kibitzers I don't know if I would bid it ever.
So 4♣ by now, maybe a 5♣ rebid is taken as void, maybe it is taken as natural, with all those kibitzers I don't know if I would bid it ever.
I play it your way. I think Five Clubs is too valuable as a slam try (ie this hand) to reserve for Exclusion, which I only play with majors agreed.
Page 1 of 1
MickyB's nice hand
IMO Pass = 10, 4♦ = 9, 5♣ (whatever it means) = 8.