BBO Discussion Forums: I played at the club yesterday! - BBO Discussion Forums

Jump to content

  • 2 Pages +
  • 1
  • 2
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

I played at the club yesterday!

#21 User is offline   lalldonn 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 1,066
  • Joined: 2012-March-06

Posted 2012-December-22, 11:26

1. I tried 2. Partner had QJxxx Kx KJx Axx. They let me out for down 1.

2. I tried 3 (how did you know lol). Partner bid 4 with AT9xx Kxx QTxxx - and made it. I still think it's the right evaluation. And I agree with those who say double shouldn't really be support here, but at the table I knew it was.

3. Partner passed and it went all pass. I had QJTxx xx Qxx xxx and hearts were 5-2 so we went -140 instead of +170 or +420. Oops. Hard to blame him though.
"What's the big rebid problem? After 1♦ - 1♠, I can rebid 1NT, 2♠, or 2♦."
- billw55
0

#22 User is offline   PhilKing 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 3,240
  • Joined: 2012-June-25

Posted 2012-December-22, 16:04

View Postlalldonn, on 2012-December-22, 11:26, said:


2. I tried 3 (how did you know lol). Partner bid 4 with AT9xx Kxx QTxxx - and made it. I still think it's the right evaluation. And I agree with those who say double shouldn't really be support here, but at the table I knew it was.



Interesting. Is 3 right with that? My view is coloured by playing that the support double promises a decent weak NT (else pass), so I would pot game. Playing the dreaded mandatory support double, I would just bid 3, I guess.
0

  • 2 Pages +
  • 1
  • 2
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users