BBO Discussion Forums: easy suit combo I didn´t know - BBO Discussion Forums

Jump to content

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

easy suit combo I didn´t know

#1 User is offline   Fluffy 

  • World International Master without a clue
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 17,404
  • Joined: 2003-November-13
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:madrid

Posted 2012-April-02, 04:58

1076

AJ8543
1

#2 User is offline   dake50 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 2,211
  • Joined: 2006-April-22

Posted 2012-April-02, 05:05

Lead J.
Defenders duck fearing to let 10 be an entry.
0

#3 User is offline   phil_20686 

  • Scotland
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 2,754
  • Joined: 2008-August-22
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Scotland

Posted 2012-April-02, 05:59

Dont you just cash the ace? pick up all 2-2 and half of 3-1?

Running the ten picks up all 2-2 except KQ offside, but loses to stiff honour onside. It gains against HHx onside. However, those two are exactly equal. Running the ten will pick up KQxx onside, but that is less than KQ offside I think.
The physics is theoretical, but the fun is real. - Sheldon Cooper
0

#4 User is offline   ArtK78 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 7,786
  • Joined: 2004-September-05
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Galloway NJ USA
  • Interests:Bridge, Poker, participatory and spectator sports.
    Occupation - Tax Attorney in Atlantic City, NJ.

Posted 2012-April-02, 06:12

I would play the Ace.
0

#5 User is offline   sasioc 

  • PipPipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 158
  • Joined: 2010-September-13
  • Gender:Female
  • Location:London

Posted 2012-April-02, 06:31

There appear to be a number of reasonable lines in the suit, which I'll consider in turn. There are 2^4 = 16 possible layouts.

1) Cashing the ace wins on 10/16 layouts (all 2-2, stiff honour on your left or right)

2) Low to the jack (then cashing the A if it loses to an honour with LHO) wins on 10/16 layouts (all 2-2, stiff honour on right, KQx with RHO)

3) Running the 10 then playing low to the J (could cash A on 2nd round but this trades two 3-1 breaks for one 2-2 break so is not right) wins on 10/16 layouts (all 2-2 except KQ on right, 4-0 onside, KQx on right, Hxx on right)

4) Playing a low card off dummy and covering whatever LHO plays wins on 11/16 layouts (4-0 onside, KQ9 or Hxx onside, stiff H on your right, all 2-2 except HH on your left)

So you should play a low one off the dunny and cover RHO's card, repeating this on the second round (for the same reason that it's right to play low to J rather than cash A on the 2nd round in line 2)
1

#6 User is offline   kayin801 

  • Modern Day Trebuchet Enthusiast
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 738
  • Joined: 2007-October-17
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Western Mass.

Posted 2012-April-02, 06:46

A) - KQ92 (1 case)
B) 2 KQ9 (1 case)
C) 9 KQ2 (1 case)
D) KQ 92 (1 case)
E) H H92 (2 cases)
F) H92 H (2 cases)

And all other cases are irrelevant. You'll pick up all other 2-2 breaks by leading low from dummy twice or by cashing the A and nothing you can do about KQx(x) offside.

Cashing the ace loses to A, B, and C (3 cases)
Running the 10 planning to finesse again loses to D and F (3 cases)
Running the 10 planning to cash the A loses to E and F (4 cases)
Leading low to the J loses to A and E (3 cases)
Leading low to hand and covering whatever RHO plays loses to C and D (2 cases)

Last one is a winner? Unless case D being a 2-2 break makes cashing the A or low to the J better enough to account for the extra case given up. (Think those two are the same). I always forget how that works.
I once yelled at my partner for discarding the 'wrong' card when he was subjected to a squeeze that I allowed by giving the wrong count with too high a card. Now he's allowed to pitch aces when the opponents have the king in the dummy. At trick 2. When he could have followed suit. And blame me.

East4Evil sohcahtoa 4ever!!!!!1
0

#7 User is offline   JLOGIC 

  • 2011 Poster of The Year winner
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 6,002
  • Joined: 2010-July-08
  • Gender:Male

Posted 2012-April-02, 07:33

low to the 8
0

#8 User is offline   JLOGIC 

  • 2011 Poster of The Year winner
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 6,002
  • Joined: 2010-July-08
  • Gender:Male

Posted 2012-April-02, 07:35

edit oops i think i messed up...
0

#9 User is offline   fred 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 4,599
  • Joined: 2003-February-11
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Las Vegas, USA

Posted 2012-April-02, 07:54

I am fairly sure that in a perfect world it is right to start by taking a deep finesse, but in the real world it matters whether or not you think your RHO is capable of playing the 9 from 9x or H9x.

Fred Gitelman
Bridge Base Inc.
www.bridgebase.com
0

#10 User is offline   Trinidad 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 4,531
  • Joined: 2005-October-09
  • Location:Netherlands

Posted 2012-April-02, 08:06

View Postfred, on 2012-April-02, 07:54, said:

I am fairly sure that in a perfect world it is right to start by taking a deep finesse, but in the real world it matters whether or not you think your RHO is capable of playing the 9 from 9x or H9x.

Fred Gitelman
Bridge Base Inc.
www.bridgebase.com

A long time ago, I held 9x in a similar situation and played the nine. My clever false card put the contract down. Declarer complemented me and more or less apologized for thinking I wouldn't be able to find the falsecard.

Well, I wasn't. I had merely signaled a doubleton to partner. ;)

Rik
I want my opponents to leave my table with a smile on their face and without matchpoints on their score card - in that order.
The most exciting phrase to hear in science, the one that heralds the new discoveries, is not “Eureka!” (I found it!), but “That’s funny…” – Isaac Asimov
The only reason God did not put "Thou shalt mind thine own business" in the Ten Commandments was that He thought that it was too obvious to need stating. - Kenberg
4

#11 User is offline   JLOGIC 

  • 2011 Poster of The Year winner
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 6,002
  • Joined: 2010-July-08
  • Gender:Male

Posted 2012-April-02, 08:08

http://bridgewinners...final-board-57/
0

#12 User is offline   Fluffy 

  • World International Master without a clue
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 17,404
  • Joined: 2003-November-13
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:madrid

Posted 2012-April-02, 08:13

What Fred said is what I was thinking, you´ve got to play 9 from H9x and 9x to avoid being hooked off your KQ9 and protect partner´s stiff KQ

The best play of the suit depends on the info opponents know since playing the 9 from H9x is normally costly if we have 5 card suit.
0

#13 User is offline   Trinidad 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 4,531
  • Joined: 2005-October-09
  • Location:Netherlands

Posted 2012-April-02, 08:36

Double post deleted
I want my opponents to leave my table with a smile on their face and without matchpoints on their score card - in that order.
The most exciting phrase to hear in science, the one that heralds the new discoveries, is not “Eureka!” (I found it!), but “That’s funny…” – Isaac Asimov
The only reason God did not put "Thou shalt mind thine own business" in the Ten Commandments was that He thought that it was too obvious to need stating. - Kenberg
0

#14 User is offline   manudude03 

  • - - A AKQJT9876543
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 2,614
  • Joined: 2007-October-02
  • Gender:Male

Posted 2012-April-02, 08:37

I posted a very similar combination a few years back:

Suit Combination
Wayne Somerville
0

#15 User is offline   Phil 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 10,092
  • Joined: 2008-December-11
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:North Texas, USA
  • Interests:Mountain Biking

Posted 2012-April-02, 09:18

View Postmanudude03, on 2012-April-02, 08:37, said:

I posted a very similar combination a few years back:

Suit Combination


Foo at his best.
Hi y'all!

Winner - BBO Challenge bracket #6 - February, 2017.
0

#16 User is offline   Fluffy 

  • World International Master without a clue
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 17,404
  • Joined: 2003-November-13
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:madrid

Posted 2012-April-02, 10:46

View Postmanudude03, on 2012-April-02, 08:37, said:

I posted a very similar combination a few years back:

Suit Combination

Doesn´t count because you posted it on the wrong forum :P
0

#17 User is offline   mgoetze 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 4,942
  • Joined: 2005-January-28
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Cologne, Germany
  • Interests:Sleeping, Eating

Posted 2012-April-02, 23:03

View PostFluffy, on 2012-April-02, 10:46, said:

Doesn´t count because you posted it on the wrong forum :P

But you responded anyway (reply #42). :P

Of course, the real gem of that thread is reply #26 - possibly the only time Frances has ever written a 3-letter post.
"One of the painful things about our time is that those who feel certainty are stupid, and those with any imagination and understanding are filled with doubt and indecision"
    -- Bertrand Russell
0

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users