Noisy Children
#2
Posted 2012-March-30, 10:56
ahydra
#3
Posted 2012-March-30, 11:01
ahydra, on 2012-March-30, 10:56, said:
ahydra
x is takeout or at least "cards". Its frequently the only way to bid the hand without a spade stop looking for 3N.
Winner - BBO Challenge bracket #6 - February, 2017.
#4
Posted 2012-March-30, 11:15
I don't generally advocate planning for the post-mortem in the auction....we're better off trying to do the right thing that planning our arguments about why we did the wrong thing....but double is the most flexible action we have.
If partner can't bid 3N, then we're going to have to hope he bids a red suit, since we have to pull 4♣ to 4♦ and now LHO is on lead. However, if he lacks a spade stop, we rate to have 28-30 hcp outside of the spade suit, so we should be ok.
I'm letting him play 4♥...we could make even if trump are 5-1
#5
Posted 2012-March-30, 13:06
mikeh, on 2012-March-30, 11:15, said:
I don't generally advocate planning for the post-mortem in the auction....we're better off trying to do the right thing that planning our arguments about why we did the wrong thing....but double is the most flexible action we have.
If partner can't bid 3N, then we're going to have to hope he bids a red suit, since we have to pull 4♣ to 4♦ and now LHO is on lead. However, if he lacks a spade stop, we rate to have 28-30 hcp outside of the spade suit, so we should be ok.
I'm letting him play 4♥...we could make even if trump are 5-1
If p doesn't have a spade stop, why would RHO bid spades? let 3NT get back to him and double it.
#6
Posted 2012-March-30, 13:25
If I played dble as cards I would still do that.
In both cases I expect to be defending 3sx quite often, and am happy with that.
#7
Posted 2012-March-30, 13:46
- billw55
#8
Posted 2012-March-30, 14:20
lalldonn, on 2012-March-30, 13:46, said:
Exactly my point... I would never bid a solid suit over any number of NT unless I was so strong that I knew 1NT would be passed out. I will, however, double 2NT or 3NT if it comes back to me, because at that point it's usually very difficult for them to find a safe spot to land.
#9
Posted 2012-March-30, 14:48
Other table reached 6♦.
Winner - BBO Challenge bracket #6 - February, 2017.
#10
Posted 2012-March-30, 19:00
Phil, on 2012-March-30, 14:48, said:
Other table reached 6♦.
Would you feel better if he opened it on Ax AQx KQJTx Axx? I guess there is the 1-round holdup value in spades, and the chance to try Q from Qxx in dummy at trick 1, but... could easily miss a game opposite QJT JTx 9x xxxx. Would love to hear your thoughts.
#11
Posted 2012-March-30, 20:12
HighLow21, on 2012-March-30, 19:00, said:
Quote
I would, because this is a 2N opening. But the best reason of all is the actual hand is virtually cold for 6♦, and this hand is marginally better than 50%! But thanks for making my point.
Quote
First off, I'd eke out a response on this, but I do not feel strongly about it, and I would definitely pass a 2♥ reverse if I did. Second, while I'm on my 3rd glass of Cab, I am not clear where nine tricks are coming from with this, or if
I even want to be in game. Feels kind of sketchy to me.
Tate, you are swimming around in the expert pool. Try to present examples that have the right amount of cards
Winner - BBO Challenge bracket #6 - February, 2017.
#12
Posted 2012-March-30, 20:42
Phil, on 2012-March-30, 20:12, said:
First off, I'd eke out a response on this, but I do not feel strongly about it, and I would definitely pass a 2♥ reverse if I did. Second, while I'm on my 3rd glass of Cab, I am not clear where nine tricks are coming from with this, or if
I even want to be in game. Feels kind of sketchy to me.
Tate, you are swimming around in the expert pool. Try to present examples that have the right amount of cards
Should be an extra x in either minor.
#13
Posted 2012-March-30, 21:02
Phil, on 2012-March-30, 20:12, said:
Oh dear. You are hurting my sensibilities. Cab just does not narrow it down: Is it Cabernet Sauvignon, Cabernet Franc, Cabernet Dorsa, Cabernet Mitos or just a lot of naked women?
PS: If you dont get the joke, look up Cabaret.
#14
Posted 2012-March-30, 23:17
#16
Posted 2012-March-31, 11:58
- billw55
#17
Posted 2012-April-01, 00:06
lalldonn, on 2012-March-31, 11:58, said:
This has become popular among those who has 'reverse' phobia. Those who are not confident with their continuation after reverse are leaning towards this type of opening a lot, at least thats why i think they do. I have to admit i do that with pick up partners a lot where i dont even know if we play lebensol or whatever after reverse, whats forcing and whats not. But that was not the case with Phil and his partner, they are playing for a while as far as i know.
"It's only when a mosquito lands on your testicles that you realize there is always a way to solve problems without using violence!"
"Well to be perfectly honest, in my humble opinion, of course without offending anyone who thinks differently from my point of view, but also by looking into this matter in a different perspective and without being condemning of one's view's and by trying to make it objectified, and by considering each and every one's valid opinion, I honestly believe that I completely forgot what I was going to say."
#18
Posted 2012-April-01, 01:35
If my pard opened 2NT with a stiff ace of spades, I would be mildly insulted. He must not like my dummy play.
#19
Posted 2012-April-02, 14:09
Phil, on 2012-March-30, 14:48, said:
Other table reached 6♦.
#20
Posted 2012-April-03, 07:54
the Freman, Chani from the move "Dune"
"I learned long ago, never to wrestle with a pig. You get dirty, and besides, the pig likes it."
George Bernard Shaw