West leads the ♣J; low, low, Q. When you cash a high trump, both opps follow low. What's the best matchpoint plan?
Dispatch from the Front #2
#1
Posted 2012-February-24, 12:17
West leads the ♣J; low, low, Q. When you cash a high trump, both opps follow low. What's the best matchpoint plan?
Dianne, I'm holding in my hand a small box of chocolate bunnies... --Agent Dale Cooper
#2
Posted 2012-February-24, 13:03
If LHO ruffs the 3rd round of clubs, I'll be unhappy, but I'll overruff and exit a diamond toward hand. I think lefty should win this and exit a trump, but there's an off chance that the DAK are onside, as well as a chance that he won't exit a trump.
If all attempts at 11 fail, I have plenty of chances still for 10, which I expect will still net some portion of the MPs.
"...we live off being battle-scarred veterans who manage to hate our opponents slightly more than we hate each other.” -- Hamman, re: Wolff
#3
Posted 2012-February-24, 13:26
But I think things like Jx increase the likelihood that LHO leads from a more robust holding in a red suit. I'm not sure how to weight these holdings.
"...we live off being battle-scarred veterans who manage to hate our opponents slightly more than we hate each other.” -- Hamman, re: Wolff
#4
Posted 2012-February-24, 22:17
a- discard ♦ on 3rd ♣ and play a ♥ towards dummy and try to guess for 11th trick
b- Cash all remaining trumps and try for something to happen.
I would play the line A i guess.
"It's only when a mosquito lands on your testicles that you realize there is always a way to solve problems without using violence!"
"Well to be perfectly honest, in my humble opinion, of course without offending anyone who thinks differently from my point of view, but also by looking into this matter in a different perspective and without being condemning of one's view's and by trying to make it objectified, and by considering each and every one's valid opinion, I honestly believe that I completely forgot what I was going to say."
#5
Posted 2012-February-25, 10:39
MrAce, on 2012-February-24, 22:17, said:
a- discard ♦ on 3rd ♣ and play a ♥ towards dummy and try to guess for 11th trick
b- Cash all remaining trumps and try for something to happen.
I would play the line A i guess.
Are you cold for 11 if RHO wins the first diamond and leads a club? You have entry problems. Seems like your line (w optimal defense) is always going to come down to playing for the HK onside. But maybe I'm missing something? Same problem if LHO wins the first diamond (not unlikely) and leads a club (not unlikely).
"...we live off being battle-scarred veterans who manage to hate our opponents slightly more than we hate each other.” -- Hamman, re: Wolff
#6
Posted 2012-February-25, 12:47
wyman, on 2012-February-24, 13:26, said:
But I think things like Jx increase the likelihood that LHO leads from a more robust holding in a red suit. I'm not sure how to weight these holdings.
I think it's very unlikely that LHO has led from Jx. With a strong notrump on the right and a one-suiter on the left, that's a very unappealing lead.
If we discount Jx and assume that they'd always lead a club from the other holdings, that makes it about 50:50 whether the clubs will stand up.
#7
Posted 2012-February-25, 19:51
wyman, on 2012-February-25, 10:39, said:
You are correct, i am not cold, i missed the fact that lead was ♣.
EDIT : In this case i wld take the 2nd ♣ cash 3rd one and discard a ♥ and ruff 4th ♣ and play 2nd ♦, now i am cold for 11 if rho takes it and i am on ♥ finesse if lho takes it (he has to play heart) Of course if everyone followed 3rd ♣, if not i wld discard a ♦ instead and hope for ♥ finesse
"It's only when a mosquito lands on your testicles that you realize there is always a way to solve problems without using violence!"
"Well to be perfectly honest, in my humble opinion, of course without offending anyone who thinks differently from my point of view, but also by looking into this matter in a different perspective and without being condemning of one's view's and by trying to make it objectified, and by considering each and every one's valid opinion, I honestly believe that I completely forgot what I was going to say."
#8
Posted 2012-February-25, 22:04
#9
Posted 2012-March-08, 08:31
"...we live off being battle-scarred veterans who manage to hate our opponents slightly more than we hate each other.” -- Hamman, re: Wolff
#10
Posted 2012-March-08, 09:34
wyman, on 2012-March-08, 08:31, said:
Sorry Brian, didn't mean to leave you hanging! The full hand:
At the table my thinking was similar to MrAce's; when West followed to the second spade I overtook in dummy, and now ten tricks was the limit.
Dianne, I'm holding in my hand a small box of chocolate bunnies... --Agent Dale Cooper