Do you act over 4♠?
IMP Pair decision
#1
Posted 2012-January-12, 07:59
Do you act over 4♠?
#2
Posted 2012-January-12, 09:47
Dianne, I'm holding in my hand a small box of chocolate bunnies... --Agent Dale Cooper
#5
Posted 2012-January-12, 12:40
I am aware it doesnt need much for us to make game, but also it may get ugly real easy at these colors since there is a good chance we may end up playing doubled in the wrong suit and sometimes even in our best fit.
"It's only when a mosquito lands on your testicles that you realize there is always a way to solve problems without using violence!"
"Well to be perfectly honest, in my humble opinion, of course without offending anyone who thinks differently from my point of view, but also by looking into this matter in a different perspective and without being condemning of one's view's and by trying to make it objectified, and by considering each and every one's valid opinion, I honestly believe that I completely forgot what I was going to say."
#6
Posted 2012-January-12, 12:48
Would not be surprised to discover that pass or 5♦ worked better
#7
Posted 2012-January-12, 13:16
I'd be interested in Justin's take, since high level decision making is the area in which the very best are generally so much better than the run of the mill player, but, to me, bidding here is problematic mainly because, even if we have a good spot, we have no assurance that we can reach it. Make this 0=3=5=5 and I'd be happier about bidding.
Consider:
Double: most of the time, partner will have nowhere to go and we'd better hope he has defence. If he does bid, he'll often bid 4N, two places to play. What then? if we bid our 6 card suit, maybe we find that he was 3=4=2=4 and now he corrects to hearts. Ugh.
4N: we show 2 places to play, and he bids 5♣, which gets hammered....what do we do? We can't pull to diamonds, because that promises 4+ hearts. And what would you bid over 4N if you were partner, looking at, say, 3=4=3=3 We'd play 5♣x'd on a 4-3 with the good, long trump tapped at trick one and no ability to take diamond tricks.....can you spell 1700?
5♦: all of our not very large eggs in one somewhat frail basket.
We seem to have a choice of being a chicken or a lemming.....I'm being true to my nature......chicken.
#8
Posted 2012-January-12, 17:40
This is the sort of hand where there could easily be a double game swing or we may just increase the penalty when they are sacrificing. I'm not that worried about partner pulling when both sides are not making. The way I play he definitely will not pull with 3424.
Of course we could concede a big penalty or partner could bid too much, especially if he the spade ace. But I just think the cost of these is less than what we stand to lose by passing.
#9
Posted 2012-January-12, 20:55
#10
Posted 2012-January-12, 21:55
#11
Posted 2012-January-12, 22:47
Wrong for anything except making 11 tricks somewhere and I don't have enough tickets.
What is baby oil made of?
#12
Posted 2012-January-13, 06:08
#13
Posted 2012-January-13, 06:27
#14
Posted 2012-January-13, 07:02
If double were "cards" or "values", I have no idea what I'd do. Luckily that's somebody else's problem.
#15
Posted 2012-January-13, 10:34
gnasher, on 2012-January-13, 07:02, said:
If double were "cards" or "values", I have no idea what I'd do. Luckily that's somebody else's problem.
#16
Posted 2012-January-13, 11:00
If RHO did redouble, I probably wouldn't sit it. Let's hope that nobody I play against is reading this.
#17
Posted 2012-January-13, 11:03
"It's only when a mosquito lands on your testicles that you realize there is always a way to solve problems without using violence!"
"Well to be perfectly honest, in my humble opinion, of course without offending anyone who thinks differently from my point of view, but also by looking into this matter in a different perspective and without being condemning of one's view's and by trying to make it objectified, and by considering each and every one's valid opinion, I honestly believe that I completely forgot what I was going to say."
#18
Posted 2012-January-13, 11:31
http://tinyurl.com/78um9vp
The actual result was -800, but it could have been worse (much worse - there was a chance for 1400).
Spades makes 11 tricks.
Pretty peculiar 3♠ opening by the North hand (in fact, of the 40 or so times the hand was played, this was the only instance of a 3♠ opening, the others being 2♠ or pass), but that is just a comment. It certainly is not relevant to the result.
There was one instance of 5♦x -1100. In that case, the West hand had the opportunity to bid diamonds at the two level and clubs at the four level. Over 4♠, opposite a silent partner, the player holding this hand unilaterally bid 5♦.
#19
Posted 2012-January-13, 11:36
As i said in my post, it may get ugly real quick at these colors. Did they take you to emergency room immediately ? Was the ambulance on time ? (joking m8 )
"It's only when a mosquito lands on your testicles that you realize there is always a way to solve problems without using violence!"
"Well to be perfectly honest, in my humble opinion, of course without offending anyone who thinks differently from my point of view, but also by looking into this matter in a different perspective and without being condemning of one's view's and by trying to make it objectified, and by considering each and every one's valid opinion, I honestly believe that I completely forgot what I was going to say."