BBO Discussion Forums: Let's Settle This Once And For All - BBO Discussion Forums

Jump to content

  • 2 Pages +
  • 1
  • 2
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

Let's Settle This Once And For All An Auction

#1 User is offline   kfay 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 2,208
  • Joined: 2007-July-01
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Michigan
  • Interests:Science, Sports

Posted 2011-November-01, 11:39

1♠-2♦
2♥-3♣

Natural or No? (2/1)
Kevin Fay
0

#2 User is offline   wyman 

  • Redoubling with gusto
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 1,712
  • Joined: 2009-October-19
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Las Vegas, NV
  • Interests:Math, Bridge, Beer. Often at the same time.

Posted 2011-November-01, 11:41

your location is wrong imo

edit:
  • Location:Ann Arbor, MI

"I think maybe so and so was caught cheating but maybe I don't have the names right". Sure, and I think maybe your mother .... Oh yeah, that was someone else maybe. -- kenberg

"...we live off being battle-scarred veterans who manage to hate our opponents slightly more than we hate each other.” -- Hamman, re: Wolff
0

#3 User is offline   gwnn 

  • Csaba the Hutt
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 13,027
  • Joined: 2006-June-16
  • Gender:Male
  • Interests:bye

Posted 2011-November-01, 11:54

Natural.

<3 kfay welcome back, i missed you :(
... and I can prove it with my usual, flawless logic.
      George Carlin
0

#4 User is offline   Hanoi5 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 4,082
  • Joined: 2006-August-31
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Santiago, Chile
  • Interests:Bridge, Video Games, Languages, Travelling.

Posted 2011-November-01, 12:07

Artificial.

 wyman, on 2012-May-04, 09:48, said:

Also, he rates to not have a heart void when he leads the ♥3.


 rbforster, on 2012-May-20, 21:04, said:

Besides playing for fun, most people also like to play bridge to win


My YouTube Channel
0

#5 User is offline   EricK 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 2,303
  • Joined: 2003-February-14
  • Location:England

Posted 2011-November-01, 12:35

 gwnn, on 2011-November-01, 11:54, said:

Natural.

 Hanoi5, on 2011-November-01, 12:07, said:

Artificial.

Well I'm glad we've settled that one.
0

#6 User is online   jillybean 

  • hooked
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 10,126
  • Joined: 2003-November-15
  • Gender:Female
  • Location:Vancouver, Canada
  • Interests:Multi

Posted 2011-November-01, 12:43

Natural. I'm interested as to why would you need artificial in an already gf auction?
"And no matter what methods you play, it is essential, for anyone aspiring to learn to be a good player, to learn the importance of bidding shape properly." MikeH
1

#7 User is offline   nigel_k 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 2,207
  • Joined: 2009-April-26
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Wellington, NZ

Posted 2011-November-01, 13:03

Artificial.

If I have Ax Kxx AQJxx xxx I really want to bid 3♣ artifical. If I have x xx AQJxx AQxxx I can bid 2NT. There is room for partner to bid 3♣ next and even if he does we may still belong in NT.
http://bridgethoughts.blogspot.com
0

#8 User is offline   gnasher 

  • Andy Bowles
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 11,993
  • Joined: 2007-May-03
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:London, UK

Posted 2011-November-01, 13:05

Quote

I'm interested as to why would you need artificial in an already gf auction?

It's so that you can avoid misdescribing or wrongsiding Kx KJx AQxxx xxx.
... that would still not be conclusive proof, before someone wants to explain that to me as well as if I was a 5 year-old. - gwnn
0

#9 User is offline   gnasher 

  • Andy Bowles
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 11,993
  • Joined: 2007-May-03
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:London, UK

Posted 2011-November-01, 13:11

Instead of argung the merits of two imperfect methods, maybe it would be better to try to solve the underlying problem, which is that we have one more hand-type to show than we have bids available.

This appears to solve all the problems at small cost:

2♠ = 2353 or a notrump-oriented 2254, with or without a club stop
2NT = 3-card spade support
3♣ = natural
... that would still not be conclusive proof, before someone wants to explain that to me as well as if I was a 5 year-old. - gwnn
0

#10 User is offline   whereagles 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 14,900
  • Joined: 2004-May-11
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Portugal
  • Interests:Everything!

Posted 2011-November-01, 13:58

You can make a good case for 2 meanings:

1. Natural, 55 or better and slam-aspiring hand.
2. Artificial, asking for a stop in the suit bid.

I have it settled in my notes as #2.
0

#11 User is offline   Siegmund 

  • Alchemist
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 1,764
  • Joined: 2004-June-15
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Beside a little lake in northwestern Montana
  • Interests:Creator of the 'grbbridge' LaTeX typesetting package.

Posted 2011-November-01, 18:35

Artificial for me.
0

#12 User is offline   phil_20686 

  • Scotland
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 2,754
  • Joined: 2008-August-22
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Scotland

Posted 2011-November-01, 19:15

I play 2N = shape asking relay, and 3c = asking for a club stop.


if you are, say, 2-3-5-3 as suggested in 2/1 I would bid 3c without a club stop and 2N if I had one, in both cases expecting to hear 3d with 3 card support. For me 2S guarantees 3S. If you are, say 1-3-6-3 you should bid 3d if your diamonds are good, this is still GF for me. If you are 1-3-5-4, then the 2N shape ask will uncover if partner has 3d, if he bids 3c to pattern out I would bid 3N. Thus you can use the shape ask with 55 minors. This is pretty normal 2/1 agreements where I play.
The physics is theoretical, but the fun is real. - Sheldon Cooper
0

#13 User is offline   phil_20686 

  • Scotland
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 2,754
  • Joined: 2008-August-22
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Scotland

Posted 2011-November-01, 19:18

 gnasher, on 2011-November-01, 13:11, said:

Instead of argung the merits of two imperfect methods, maybe it would be better to try to solve the underlying problem, which is that we have one more hand-type to show than we have bids available.

This appears to solve all the problems at small cost:

2♠ = 2353 or a notrump-oriented 2254, with or without a club stop
2NT = 3-card spade support
3♣ = natural


The problem hand seems to be 1-3-6-3 with poor diamonds, or 2-3-5-3 with reasonable diamnds and xxx clubs. Both of which could play much better in 5D opposite a 5-4-3-1 shape,
The physics is theoretical, but the fun is real. - Sheldon Cooper
0

#14 User is offline   aguahombre 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 12,029
  • Joined: 2009-February-21
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:St. George, UT

Posted 2011-November-01, 19:34

How about, "yes"...it is natural or artificial. Opener continues with pattern, primarily; but with 5-4-2-2 only rebids 3NT with HX in clubs, otherwise bids 3D.

edit: with 5-4-0-4, opener doesn't get to raise clubs.

This post has been edited by aguahombre: 2011-November-01, 19:40

"Bidding Spades to show spades can work well." (Kenberg)
0

#15 User is offline   MrAce 

  • VIP Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 6,971
  • Joined: 2009-November-14
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Houston, TX

Posted 2011-November-01, 22:49

 kfay, on 2011-November-01, 11:39, said:

1♠-2♦
2♥-3♣

Natural or No? (2/1)


I agree with Aguaman

Does it really matter if it is artificial or natural for the opener, at this stage ?
"Genius has its own limitations, however stupidity has no such boundaries!"
"It's only when a mosquito lands on your testicles that you realize there is always a way to solve problems without using violence!"

"Well to be perfectly honest, in my humble opinion, of course without offending anyone who thinks differently from my point of view, but also by looking into this matter in a different perspective and without being condemning of one's view's and by trying to make it objectified, and by considering each and every one's valid opinion, I honestly believe that I completely forgot what I was going to say."
0

#16 User is offline   Free 

  • mmm Duvel
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 10,728
  • Joined: 2003-July-30
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Belgium
  • Interests:Duvel, Whisky

Posted 2011-November-02, 04:14

ART

What's the need for this to be natural? Chances of a 4-4 ♣ fit are very small, responder can easily bid 2NT with stopper ♣ and then opener can pattern out. Without a ♣ stopper he can now bid 4th suit and opener knows what's going on.
"It may be rude to leave to go to the bathroom, but it's downright stupid to sit there and piss yourself" - blackshoe
0

#17 User is offline   Zelandakh 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 10,696
  • Joined: 2006-May-18
  • Gender:Not Telling

Posted 2011-November-02, 05:36

From what I have seen, natural in USA (and perhaps Canada), artificial in most of the rest of the world. I prefer Free's approach here to back into the club fit when it is necessary but hide it when we are playing 3NT anyway. This seems to be the simplest way without playing some gadget to cope with otherwise awkward hands.
(-: Zel :-)
0

#18 User is offline   TWO4BRIDGE 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 2,247
  • Joined: 2010-October-21
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Texas

Posted 2011-November-02, 16:35

I say it is natural ( 3 or 4 cards ) and NO ♣-stop ( or a half-stop ) .

3C says: no 3s, no 4h, no 6d ... ergo: 2 3 5 3 or 2 3 4 4 .

[ With ♣-stop(s), you would have rebid some number of NT ] .
Don Stenmark
TWOferBRIDGE
"imo by far in bridge the least understood concept is how to bid over a jump-shift
( 1M-1NT!-3m-?? )." ....Justin Lall

" Did someone mention relays? " .... Zelandakh

K-Rex to Mikeh : " Sometimes you drive me nuts " .
0

#19 User is offline   Free 

  • mmm Duvel
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 10,728
  • Joined: 2003-July-30
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Belgium
  • Interests:Duvel, Whisky

Posted 2011-November-03, 03:06

Partner can also have a poor 6 card suit which he doesn't want to bid. However, in that case he'll usually have ♠Hx (rebid 2♠) or a ♣ stopper (rebid 2NT). So I guess natural can make some sense, I just don't play it that way... :)
"It may be rude to leave to go to the bathroom, but it's downright stupid to sit there and piss yourself" - blackshoe
0

#20 User is offline   kfay 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 2,208
  • Joined: 2007-July-01
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Michigan
  • Interests:Science, Sports

Posted 2011-November-03, 12:41

The auction came up recently where I was bidding a hand with another forum member.

For him 3♣ was artificial, so he was forced to bid 2NT with Jx --- A109xxx AQJxx

I was 5422 so aside from some miscommunication that arose surrounding the 2N bid I thought the auction would have really sucked playing these methods and made it basically impossible to reach 6m (which is on) without blind guessing.

I realize this hand is less frequent than the hand that wants to bid 2NT. Still, it seems real screwed up to me that people can't bid clubs naturally (or at least confidently at some level) playing 'good' methods.

Maybe I'm coming around on this whole artificial business but I doubt I'll be playing it anytime soon (not because of this hand but just because of general principles).
Kevin Fay
0
  • 2 Pages +
  • 1
  • 2
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

2 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 2 guests, 0 anonymous users