BBO Discussion Forums: what do you bid here? - BBO Discussion Forums

Jump to content

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

what do you bid here?

#1 User is online   jillybean 

  • hooked
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 10,178
  • Joined: 2003-November-15
  • Gender:Female
  • Location:Vancouver, Canada
  • Interests:Multi

Posted 2011-January-02, 11:27

both V, IMP, 1st position

J, KQ32, K952, AQ97

uncontested auction
1:1
?
"And no matter what methods you play, it is essential, for anyone aspiring to learn to be a good player, to learn the importance of bidding shape properly." MikeH
0

#2 User is offline   mgoetze 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 4,942
  • Joined: 2005-January-28
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Cologne, Germany
  • Interests:Sleeping, Eating

Posted 2011-January-02, 11:57

obv. ;)
"One of the painful things about our time is that those who feel certainty are stupid, and those with any imagination and understanding are filled with doubt and indecision"
    -- Bertrand Russell
0

#3 User is offline   pooltuna 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 3,814
  • Joined: 2009-July-23
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:New Orleans

Posted 2011-January-02, 12:40

View Postjillybean, on 2011-January-02, 11:27, said:

both V, IMP, 1st position

J, KQ32, K952, AQ97

uncontested auction
1:1
?


I cut partner some serious slack and only call 3 but have no problem with those who would rather call 4
"Tell me of your home world, Usul"
the Freman, Chani from the move "Dune"

"I learned long ago, never to wrestle with a pig. You get dirty, and besides, the pig likes it."

George Bernard Shaw
0

#4 User is offline   MarkDean 

  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 595
  • Joined: 2008-April-30
  • Location:Pleasanton, CA, US

Posted 2011-January-02, 12:45

I would bid 3, but that is partly because I raise with 3 somewhat frequently. If we are playing a style where we basically always have 4 for a raise, then I think it is close, and would probably only bid 2.
0

#5 User is offline   mike777 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 16,838
  • Joined: 2003-October-07
  • Gender:Male

Posted 2011-January-02, 15:26

View Postjillybean, on 2011-January-02, 11:27, said:

both V, IMP, 1st position

J, KQ32, K952, AQ97

uncontested auction
1:1
?



3h no problem yet.
0

#6 User is offline   Fluffy 

  • World International Master without a clue
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 17,404
  • Joined: 2003-November-13
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:madrid

Posted 2011-January-02, 16:01

this is a prototypical hand for 3, what am I missing?
0

#7 User is offline   nigel_k 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 2,207
  • Joined: 2009-April-26
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Wellington, NZ

Posted 2011-January-02, 16:40

Definitely 3 and I think it is not close to either 2 or 4. Maybe closer to 2 if you are playing weak NT but I would still bid 3.
0

#8 User is offline   lamford 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 6,446
  • Joined: 2007-October-15

Posted 2011-January-02, 21:00

Given that xxxx Jxxxx Ax Jx is a good game, albeit it with a perfect fit, 3H is about right. A useful gadget is that 2S is either natural, a balanced raise to 3H, or a 3D bid with 3-card heart support. These are awkward hands, and the low frequency of the natural 2S makes it logical to take some of the load of other hand types. Parnter also now knows that 3H is distributional, and that helps him when considering whether to bid on.
I prefer to give the lawmakers credit for stating things for a reason - barmar
0

#9 User is offline   Cascade 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Yellows
  • Posts: 6,766
  • Joined: 2003-July-22
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:New Zealand
  • Interests:Juggling, Unicycling

Posted 2011-January-02, 22:38

Normal 3
Wayne Burrows

I believe that the USA currently hold only the World Championship For People Who Still Bid Like Your Auntie Gladys - dburn
dunno how to play 4 card majors - JLOGIC
True but I know Standard American and what better reason could I have for playing Precision? - Hideous Hog
Bidding is an estimation of probabilities SJ Simon

#10 User is offline   Siegmund 

  • Alchemist
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 1,764
  • Joined: 2004-June-15
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Beside a little lake in northwestern Montana
  • Interests:Creator of the 'grbbridge' LaTeX typesetting package.

Posted 2011-January-03, 19:54

Amazed to see a number of people calling this a 2½ hand.

For me it's a tip-top maximum for 3. Swap the SJ with a spot card in any of the other 3 suits and I would try 3 splinter. I would consider 3 on the actual cards agressive but not insane. Recall the 1m-1S-2S-4S hand from last week for an example of where the cutoff between the 2M and 3M raise is.

Disclaimer: my 1 responses are never on ugly 3-HCP hands.
0

#11 User is offline   JLOGIC 

  • 2011 Poster of The Year winner
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 6,002
  • Joined: 2010-July-08
  • Gender:Male

Posted 2011-January-03, 19:57

Agree with fluffy, this is a totally down the middle 3H bid. We have 14 HCP and a stiff jack, that's about 17 points which is exactly what 3H shows. 2H is too few and 3S is too much.
0

#12 User is offline   ahydra 

  • AQT92 AQ --- QJ6532
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 2,840
  • Joined: 2009-September-09
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Wellington, NZ

Posted 2011-January-05, 18:28

14 points = 2H
5 losers = 4H

Take an average: 3H :)

3H is what I'd bid. Hand is too weak for a SPL (but not by a lot - say the DQ) and definitely too weak for 4H, but way too good for just a wimpy 2.

ahydra
0

#13 User is online   P_Marlowe 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 10,255
  • Joined: 2005-March-18
  • Gender:Male

Posted 2011-January-07, 03:19

3H.

Having 2S av. as a minisplinter would be nice, 2S as minisplinter
would assume 1S to be forcing.

With kind regards
Marlowe
With kind regards
Uwe Gebhardt (P_Marlowe)
0

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

4 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 4 guests, 0 anonymous users