Page 1 of 1
An Auction Forcing or Not?
#1
Posted 2010-July-20, 20:03
1♦-2♣-Dbl-Rdbl
2♥-P-P-2♠
Was pass of 2♥ forcing?
Following from that then... is 2♠ forcing?
Rdbl is just HCPs, basically.
2♥-P-P-2♠
Was pass of 2♥ forcing?
Following from that then... is 2♠ forcing?
Rdbl is just HCPs, basically.
Kevin Fay
#2
Posted 2010-July-20, 20:34
Pass not forcing, you just overcalled.
2♠ I'm not sure on. If a direct 2♠ call isn't forcing then I think this 2♠ call is.
2♠ I'm not sure on. If a direct 2♠ call isn't forcing then I think this 2♠ call is.
I once yelled at my partner for discarding the 'wrong' card when he was subjected to a squeeze that I allowed by giving the wrong count with too high a card. Now he's allowed to pitch aces when the opponents have the king in the dummy. At trick 2. When he could have followed suit. And blame me.
East4Evil ♥ sohcahtoa 4ever!!!!!1
East4Evil ♥ sohcahtoa 4ever!!!!!1
#5
Posted 2010-July-21, 03:54
I don't think pass should be forcing, and I think 2♠ clearly is. If I wanted it to be non-forcing I'd have bid it one round earlier.
... that would still not be conclusive proof, before someone wants to explain that to me as well as if I was a 5 year-old. - gwnn
#6
Posted 2010-July-21, 05:03
I wouldn't take either of them as forcing but 2♠ should perhaps be. Just don't be mad at me if I pass out your 2 level pass or 2M bid in competition where ownership is far from clear.
... and I can prove it with my usual, flawless logic.
George Carlin
George Carlin
#7
Posted 2010-July-21, 06:16
gnasher, on Jul 21 2010, 04:54 AM, said:
I don't think pass should be forcing, and I think 2♠ clearly is. If I wanted it to be non-forcing I'd have bid it one round earlier.
Yup.
blogging at http://www.justinlall.com
#8
Posted 2010-July-21, 06:28
This hurts but I agree. Redouble can be a strong hand but often is just a decent hand with a doubleton club. That should not create a force. And as gnasher said, with 5+ spades and not enough to force we could have bid 2S on the previous round.
and the result can be plotted on a graph.
#10
Posted 2010-July-21, 12:44
whereagles, on Jul 21 2010, 12:08 PM, said:
Not forcing, unless you know opps are jokers.
that was my concern, too. Everyone at the table is acting. However, that makes me wonder if 2S is even real length. Conclusion: it is something like 5-(3-3-2) and choice to play 2S or 3C. That hand might not choose to bid 2S or 3C on the previous round, but rather make a snappish redouble then show two places to play.
Edit: Maybe responder thought that, after the neg double, a direct 2S should guarantee 6 of them.
"Bidding Spades to show spades can work well." (Kenberg)
#11
Posted 2010-July-21, 15:03
Non-forcing does make sense too, double to show values and a doubleton club, then 2S to suggest spades, while a direct 2S would suggest a better suit.
Either way I now agree that pass is NF.
Either way I now agree that pass is NF.
and the result can be plotted on a graph.
#12
Posted 2010-July-23, 03:49
if the double of opp shows both majors, i would think 2S after redouble is forcing
Page 1 of 1

Help
