I'm pretty amazed that people want to GF on this. Unless you catch a fit, the trick taking potential of this hand is rather limited.
I'll start with 1♠. Then:
--Over 1N - I'll call this an invite and go the 2♣ - 2♦ - 3♦ or 3♦ (wheer we play).
--Over 2♣ - I'll make a 5-5- invite via 3♦. If pard bids 3N, I'm pulling to 4♦.
--Over 2♥ - I'm passing, unless I have some sort of 2N stall available.
--Over 2♠ - 4♠
2/1 GF
#22
Posted 2008-June-23, 09:59
pclayton, on Jun 23 2008, 10:26 AM, said:
I'm pretty amazed that people want to GF on this. Unless you catch a fit, the trick taking potential of this hand is rather limited.
pfah. A 7 card suit IS a fit. You get more trump winners out of a 7-0 fit than your average 5-3 fit, and is it too much to hope that your partner has one of the little buggers? I'm not sure why all these comments about a fit. I mean, we all open at the freakin' 3 level with hands a lot less distributional than this.
I don't disagree with any of your answers here, if partner rebids hearts, well, at least it won't be a 5-0. But worrying about a 5-7 hand not having a fit seems...odd.
#23
Posted 2008-June-23, 15:22
This really isn't all that hard unless you like to mastermind.
1S, then over:
1N-get out in diamonds
2C- prefer to 2H (5-0 should play better than the 4-1)
2N- look for the 5-3 spade fit
1S, then over:
1N-get out in diamonds
2C- prefer to 2H (5-0 should play better than the 4-1)
2N- look for the 5-3 spade fit
"Injustice anywhere is a threat to justice everywhere."
#24
Posted 2008-June-23, 16:46
Winstonm, on Jun 23 2008, 10:22 PM, said:
This really isn't all that hard unless you like to mastermind.
1S, then over:
[..]
2C- prefer to 2H (5-0 should play better than the 4-1)
1S, then over:
[..]
2C- prefer to 2H (5-0 should play better than the 4-1)
Personally, I'd regard giving preference on a void to a once-bid suit as masterminding. Why do you choose the heart fit which is likely to be 5-0 rather than the spade fit which might be any of 5-0, 5-1, 5-2 or 5-3?
... that would still not be conclusive proof, before someone wants to explain that to me as well as if I was a 5 year-old. - gwnn
#25
Posted 2008-June-23, 17:02
Quote
Why do you choose the heart fit which is likely to be 5-0 rather than the spade fit which might be any of 5-0, 5-1, 5-2 or 5-3?
Some would consider 2S as encouraging and I do not think this hand good enough for that bid.
"Injustice anywhere is a threat to justice everywhere."
#26 Guest_Jlall_*
Posted 2008-June-23, 18:01
I bid 2D then spades. We got to 3N opposite xx KT9xxxx xx AQ. The opps were cold for 3N. Other table bid the same so push. lol.
#27
Posted 2008-June-23, 19:25
Fairly normal stuff.
"Gibberish in, gibberish out. A trial judge, three sets of lawyers, and now three appellate judges cannot agree on what this law means. And we ask police officers, prosecutors, defense lawyers, and citizens to enforce or abide by it? The legislature continues to write unreadable statutes. Gibberish should not be enforced as law."
-P.J. Painter.
-P.J. Painter.
#28
Posted 2008-June-25, 17:13
Im wondering if
1H----1S
2C----3D
Should show a splinter or a NF 47 or 5-7. Splinter like these are very rare and could be dealt with a gf 2D. The weakish 2 suiter is also rare but is a problem hand with no acceptable solution.
1H----1S
2C----3D
Should show a splinter or a NF 47 or 5-7. Splinter like these are very rare and could be dealt with a gf 2D. The weakish 2 suiter is also rare but is a problem hand with no acceptable solution.
From Psych "I mean, Gus and I never see eye-to-eye on work stuff.
For instance, he doesn't like being used as a human shield when we're being shot at.
I happen to think it's a very noble way to meet one's maker, especially for a guy like him.
Bottom line is we never let that difference of opinion interfere with anything."
For instance, he doesn't like being used as a human shield when we're being shot at.
I happen to think it's a very noble way to meet one's maker, especially for a guy like him.
Bottom line is we never let that difference of opinion interfere with anything."
#29
Posted 2008-June-25, 20:43
benlessard, on Jun 25 2008, 06:13 PM, said:
Im wondering if
1H----1S
2C----3D
Should show a splinter or a NF 47 or 5-7. Splinter like these are very rare and could be dealt with a gf 2D. The weakish 2 suiter is also rare but is a problem hand with no acceptable solution.
1H----1S
2C----3D
Should show a splinter or a NF 47 or 5-7. Splinter like these are very rare and could be dealt with a gf 2D. The weakish 2 suiter is also rare but is a problem hand with no acceptable solution.
I'd choose neither of the above. 5-5 GF for me.
"Gibberish in, gibberish out. A trial judge, three sets of lawyers, and now three appellate judges cannot agree on what this law means. And we ask police officers, prosecutors, defense lawyers, and citizens to enforce or abide by it? The legislature continues to write unreadable statutes. Gibberish should not be enforced as law."
-P.J. Painter.
-P.J. Painter.

Help
