you got preempted. how now?
#1
Posted 2008-April-24, 16:03
matchpoints, all white, you hear:
1♦-(2♥)-?
you hold QJxxx QT 98xxx x
what call do you choose?
(fit jumps were not discussed, in case you're leaning that way)
#2
Posted 2008-April-24, 16:13
#3
Posted 2008-April-24, 17:15
The main point is that when partner has a reopening hand, the opps aren't playing 2♥.. they are in 3 or 4 hearts before he gets another turn, and we may be forever jammed out of the auction.
So I ain't passing: put me down for double... I would never do this without my fifth diamond.
#4
Posted 2008-April-24, 17:21
mikeh, on Apr 24 2008, 06:15 PM, said:
The main point is that when partner has a reopening hand, the opps aren't playing 2♥.. they are in 3 or 4 hearts before he gets another turn, and we may be forever jammed out of the auction.
So I ain't passing: put me down for double... I would never do this without my fifth diamond.
Although a sound point, I think I do this the other way. I pass, and then I bid whatever number of spades I must if 3♥ or 4♥ comes back at me.
-P.J. Painter.
#5
Posted 2008-April-24, 17:24
#6
Posted 2008-April-24, 18:18
#7
Posted 2008-April-24, 18:28
#8
Posted 2008-April-24, 18:56
Do I have adequate defensive strength should PD want to get head hunting at some level of ♥, most likely not, but PF should have something cards in ♥ and then my QT may be useful. (likely a garbage overcallwas made).
OK I lean toward negX at MP's white vs white, negX for sure white vs red, pass for sure if red.
Imps, I pass no matter what, unless white vs red and expecting to need a swing as the risk of going for a big number when PD overcompetes (expecting me to have more) or makes a penalty double that I likely can't risk leaving in at Imps is too great for me.
#9
Posted 2008-April-25, 00:38
Double shows around 8 HCPs and 4 Spades here, so this hand is surely not much weaker then a hand like:
Kxxx,x,Qxxx,Kxxx
Even here, where the double normaly shows some clubs besides the spades, I have no problem with the offshape double. If Pd bids x Clubs, I can bid x Diamonds without much problems. IF he had opened 1 Club and my minors had been reversed too, the problem had been much bigger.
Roland
Sanity Check: Failure (Fluffy)
More system is not the answer...
#10
Posted 2008-April-25, 02:48
We are all connected to each other biologically, to the Earth chemically, and to the rest of the universe atomically.
We're in the universe, and the universe is in us.
#11
Posted 2008-April-25, 04:56
kenrexford, on Apr 25 2008, 12:21 AM, said:
I don't think this shows spades+diamonds. P probably reads it as a weak hand with lots of spades.
But I don't care for double. P will take me for more values than I have and double a making 5♥ or bid 3NT. Or maybe convert my double. Or bid clubs and then go for slam when I convert to diamonds. Besides the dbl doesn't show my fifth spade.
If a direct fit-showing 3♠ is available, at least that gives an idea of my shape. But I don't think I have grown sufficient synapses to do that either.
#12
Posted 2008-April-25, 05:42
helene_t, on Apr 25 2008, 05:56 AM, said:
kenrexford, on Apr 25 2008, 12:21 AM, said:
I don't think this shows spades+diamonds. P probably reads it as a weak hand with lots of spades.
But I don't care for double. P will take me for more values than I have and double a making 5♥ or bid 3NT. Or maybe convert my double. Or bid clubs and then go for slam when I convert to diamonds. Besides the dbl doesn't show my fifth spade.
If a direct fit-showing 3♠ is available, at least that gives an idea of my shape. But I don't think I have grown sufficient synapses to do that either.
My partner will understand. Any bid that sounds too strong for prior decisions must be based on a fit. Thus, passing 2♥ when I could have bid or shown spades, and then backing in with spades, must show diamonds. As I could have shown diamonds earlier, I must be unbalanced with a second suit. Not only \do the odds favor my having the suit I bid as the second suit, but majors are preferred, especially spades over hearts.
-P.J. Painter.
#13
Posted 2008-April-25, 05:50
#14
Posted 2008-April-25, 07:15
If partner bids 3NT over 3D, he probably has a strong balanced hand. I'll bid 4S, which may provoke a look of puzzlement, but will probably get the dummy on the grounds that no other interpretation makes sense. How else do you bid these hands?
#15
Posted 2008-April-25, 07:50
Yes I have a piece of garbage. But its fitting garbage.
#16
Posted 2008-April-25, 08:37
pclayton, on Apr 25 2008, 08:50 AM, said:
Yes I have a piece of garbage. But its fitting garbage.
I agree with this. But problem is partner will play you for more values and I expect bidding will escalate. What is you bid then they bid 4H and partners doubles? Do you like your chances defending or you run to 5♦?
#17
Posted 2008-April-25, 08:49
dcvetkov, on Apr 25 2008, 03:37 PM, said:
5♦ pretty clear here. Partner's double shows values, it is not a unilateral penalty double. My only concern would be whether p would bid 6/7 and/or redouble the final diamond contract, or double 5♥.
#18
Posted 2008-April-25, 09:16
He almost surely won't be doubling when they can make 5, and I have an easy, and obvious to partner, stiff club lead. I am NOT pulling. They've made doubled games against me in the past and will do so again in the future.
Passing over the overcall out of fear that partner will double a cold 4♥ is not an enjoyable way to play the game.
I am often a glass half empty kind of player, but I think this is a glass almost completely dry approach.
Look at it this way: they make and win 5 imps. On hands where you pass, you may miss a double game swing. How many imps is that?
#19
Posted 2008-April-25, 10:01
#20
Posted 2008-April-25, 10:05
mikeh, on Apr 25 2008, 10:16 AM, said:
He almost surely won't be doubling when they can make 5, and I have an easy, and obvious to partner, stiff club lead. I am NOT pulling. They've made doubled games against me in the past and will do so again in the future.
Passing over the overcall out of fear that partner will double a cold 4♥ is not an enjoyable way to play the game.
I am often a glass half empty kind of player, but I think this is a glass almost completely dry approach.
Look at it this way: they make and win 5 imps. On hands where you pass, you may miss a double game swing. How many imps is that?
You may lose a lot more than 5 IMPs. Partner will assume that you have some values and at least 4 spades. He will not assume that you hold 5 diamonds, jeopardizing some of his defensive tricks. He will also not assume that your values are so minimal (sub-minimal?). He may be doubling a cold game not realizing that you have a game in diamonds.
Passing partner's double of 4♥ after making a negative double may be compouding the original overbid (the negative double).

Help
