At my table, North managed to find a 7C bid after I showed a "balanced" hand with 16-22 HCP (albeit would need to be maximum given the 22+ total points requirement) while at the other table, North couldn't raise a 6C bid showing 32 total points. On another note, surely my 3NT should not promise a balanced hand there.
Page 1 of 1
Another paradoxical evaluation
#1
Posted 2018-April-20, 10:23
From a random arena challenge (IMPs)
At my table, North managed to find a 7C bid after I showed a "balanced" hand with 16-22 HCP (albeit would need to be maximum given the 22+ total points requirement) while at the other table, North couldn't raise a 6C bid showing 32 total points. On another note, surely my 3NT should not promise a balanced hand there.
At my table, North managed to find a 7C bid after I showed a "balanced" hand with 16-22 HCP (albeit would need to be maximum given the 22+ total points requirement) while at the other table, North couldn't raise a 6C bid showing 32 total points. On another note, surely my 3NT should not promise a balanced hand there.
Wayne Somerville
#3
Posted 2018-April-20, 14:05
Not priority to make GIB evaluate better on auctions where partner jumps to slam at their first turn.
Please let me know about any questions or interest or bug reports about GIB.
#4
Posted 2018-April-20, 14:28
In fact, wasn't it an improvement to make GIB not raise every stab at slam to a grand? (which is very much appreciated btw)
Videos of the worst bridge player ever playing bridge:
https://www.youtube....hungPlaysBridge
https://www.youtube....hungPlaysBridge
Page 1 of 1