sanst, on 2017-July-31, 05:03, said:
Certainly not explicitly. The footnote is A player is allowed to replace an unintended call if the conditions described in Law 25A are met, no matter how he may become aware of his error., which doesn't say anything about asking questions.
AFAIK, the only questions explicitly allowed are about a revoke, preventing that from becoming established, and those given in Law 41B and C. The change in Law 69, which allows the play to continue after a claim has been made, possibly also requires asking questions.
AFAIK, the only questions explicitly allowed are about a revoke, preventing that from becoming established, and those given in Law 41B and C. The change in Law 69, which allows the play to continue after a claim has been made, possibly also requires asking questions.
Why do you think "no matter how he may become aware of his error" should be interpreted differently depending on whether it's in the law text or a footnote? Either way, it includes remarks or questions by his partner, even though they violate Law 73B.