Gazzilli query
#1
Posted 2016-March-05, 09:42
1S--1NT--2C!(Gazzilli)--?
Responder holding
♠x ♥xxx ♦KJxxxx ♣Jxx
#2
Posted 2016-March-05, 10:01
Playing standard Gazzilli, this may be a 2NT rebid, depending how you defined that, else you'll have to bid 3♦.
-- Bertrand Russell
#3
Posted 2016-March-05, 11:02
mgoetze, on 2016-March-05, 10:01, said:
Assuming
1♠-1N; 2♣ = "11-15", 4+ C / "16+", any,
I've always thought standard rebids by Responder are something like
2♦ = "8+", any [GF opposite the strong option]
2♥+ = "5-7", nat.
Specifically:
2♥ = "5-7", 5+ H
2♠ = "5-7", 2S4-H [also with "4-6", 3 S if you play 1♠-2♠ as constructive]
2N = "5-7", 5+D4+C or 4H5+D, usually 1- S [=> 3♣ = to play opposite 4+ C (=> P = 4+ C; 3♦ = 4H3-C)]
3♣ = "5-7", 4-H4-D5+C, usually 1- S
3♦ = "5-7", 3-H6+D4-C, usually 1- S
Notice that hands with 5-7, 1444 are unbiddable on this interpretation.
#4
Posted 2016-March-06, 06:35
#5
Posted 2016-March-06, 07:25
nullve, on 2016-March-05, 11:02, said:
1♠-1N; 2♣ = "11-15", 4+ C / "16+", any,
I've always thought standard rebids by Responder are something like
2♦ = "8+", any [GF opposite the strong option]
2♥+ = "5-7", nat.
Specifically:
2♥ = "5-7", 5+ H
2♠ = "5-7", 2S4-H [also with "4-6", 3 S if you play 1♠-2♠ as constructive]
2N = "5-7", 5+D4+C or 4H5+D, usually 1- S [=> 3♣ = to play opposite 4+ C (=> P = 4+ C; 3♦ = 4H3-C)]
3♣ = "5-7", 4-H4-D5+C, usually 1- S
3♦ = "5-7", 3-H6+D4-C, usually 1- S
Notice that hands with 5-7, 1444 are unbiddable on this interpretation.
I was playing 2N=minors, so you'd squeeze 1444 there. Also, everything other than 2♠ was showing 0-1 spades. It's possibly better to keep the 2H response a bit vaguer but OK. This was standard Gazzilli in Iceland, called "Hexan", I think from originally Sweden, but not sure how widespread there, or in N Europe or anywhere else in Europe.
George Carlin
#6
Posted 2016-March-07, 05:13
gwnn, on 2016-March-06, 07:25, said:
I feel responder should give better definition of his heart length when he has less than 8 points after 1♠-1NT-2♣.
So 2NT = 4 hearts precisely and at most 1 spade, less than 8 HCP. Accordingly the bid shows 8-9 cards in the minors.
3♣ shows 4 or more clubs, no 4 cards in hearts and 9 or more cards in the minors.
3♦ shows 6 or more diamonds, no 4 cards in hearts.
After 3m opener will bid 3♥ only with 5.
This provides slightly less definition on the minors, but better definition of the hearts.
Over 2NT opener with 4 or more hearts has excellent information to decide whether to play 3♥ or 4♥ or in exceptional cases even 6♥.
Minor suit games are a long way off if responder has less than 8 HCP.
Rainer Herrmann
#7
Posted 2016-April-04, 15:42
rhm, on 2016-March-07, 05:13, said:
So 2NT = 4 hearts precisely and at most 1 spade, less than 8 HCP. Accordingly the bid shows 8-9 cards in the minors.
3♣ shows 4 or more clubs, no 4 cards in hearts and 9 or more cards in the minors.
3♦ shows 6 or more diamonds, no 4 cards in hearts.
After 3m opener will bid 3♥ only with 5.
This provides slightly less definition on the minors, but better definition of the hearts.
Over 2NT opener with 4 or more hearts has excellent information to decide whether to play 3♥ or 4♥ or in exceptional cases even 6♥.
Minor suit games are a long way off if responder has less than 8 HCP.
This is pretty cool, thanks. Makes much more sense!
George Carlin
#8
Posted 2016-April-04, 18:34
1. It is usual to play 2NT as weak with both minors and a diamond preference, and 3♦ as simply weak with a long suit. The given hand would bid 3♦.
2. With doubleton spade it is often better to bid 2♠ rather than try to introduce your diamonds, since you will have to go to the three-level to do so.
a.k.a. Appeal Without Merit
#9
Posted 2016-April-05, 07:25
So 2♥ is preference on any 4+card suit or 13(45)
That way 2NT is 5-5 minors & 3m is 6-cards
You can play 3♥+ as showing 6-card heart suit and a positive
#10
Posted 2016-April-05, 09:00
The Pud, on 2016-April-05, 07:25, said:
So 2♥ is preference on any 4-card suit or 13(45)
That way 2NT is 5-5 minors & 3m is 6-cards
One of the things I thought I had invented, too. Then I read this:
http://www.bridgebas...dified-gazilli/