If you're like me, you dread it when North invokes lebensohl after your 1NT opening because it has a habit of dropping me at the 3 level in its Jxxxx suit, which just happens to be LHO's secondary minor.
So why, when North has a great suit (or suits) and and a respectable hand does it bail out of the auction prematurely? Two hands from a recent ACBL matchpoints individual session raise this issue:
My link
With a great 6 card suit and 7 "total points" opposite South's 1NT overcall, why is North selling out so cheaply? Who would choose to defend with these cards?
My link
Who would choose to defend 3♥ with North's cards, guaranteed an 8+ card ♦ fit? Paradoxically, the most successful action on this hand was to open 1♣(!) and rebid showing a balanced 12-14. North then drove the auction to the 4-level (in ♦!), and ultimately collected 500 when West put its head on the block. This is another annoying instance where North bids more strongly when South shows a weaker hand.
Page 1 of 1
Invisi-bot
#2
Posted 2015-May-19, 12:14
I have to agree in both cases. The H hand is an example of exactly why Lebensohl exists - to be able to show a weak but playable hand such as this.
As for the other hand, let's focus on the range shown for 2NT - 11 or less HCP, 12 or less total points. This range make no sense opposite a 15 to 17 1NT opening bid, since the higher end of the range belongs in game. Any yes I have promised to lay off BBO bashing, but this is a simple case of either a thoughtless blunder or lack of bridge knowledge by whoever established this range.
No hard feelings, how about a correction? Or does anyone disagree with my logic?
As for the other hand, let's focus on the range shown for 2NT - 11 or less HCP, 12 or less total points. This range make no sense opposite a 15 to 17 1NT opening bid, since the higher end of the range belongs in game. Any yes I have promised to lay off BBO bashing, but this is a simple case of either a thoughtless blunder or lack of bridge knowledge by whoever established this range.
No hard feelings, how about a correction? Or does anyone disagree with my logic?
Page 1 of 1