The Problem with Religious Moderation From Sam Harris
#2
Posted 2013-May-30, 07:12
#3
Posted 2013-May-30, 08:18
Really? Critics dismiss his claim that he is the reincarnation of Jesus Christ? I am shocked.
The funny thing is, the naysayers sound very similar to the naysayers of biblical times.
As long as he doesn't hurt anyone, I don't have any problem with this. He appears to be a lot less menacing than most bible belt evangelists in the US.
#4
Posted 2013-May-30, 08:30
#6
Posted 2013-May-30, 08:59
#7
Posted 2013-May-30, 09:16
I suppose a lot of people figure he should be put away and everyone there should start paying psychiatrists to get where they think they are already.
#8
Posted 2013-May-30, 18:57
#9
Posted 2013-May-30, 20:47
kenberg, on 2013-May-30, 18:57, said:
Paul Newman in Cool Hand Luke... not really along the lines of the OP.
All I have to say about the OP is, if he starts to mix a pitcher of Kool-Aid... be careful.
#10
Posted 2013-May-31, 00:05
4 And Jesus answered and said to them, See to it that no one misleads you.
5 "For many will come in my name, saying, 'I am the Christ,' and will mislead many.
Matt 24:23-27 NASU
23 Then if anyone says to you, 'Behold, here is the Christ,' or ' There He is,' do not believe him.
24 "For false Christs and false prophets will arise and will show great signs and wonders, so as to mislead, if possible, even the elect.
25 "Behold, I have told you in advance.
26 "So if they say to you, 'Behold, He is in the wilderness,' do not go out, or, 'Behold, He is in the inner rooms,' do not believe them.
27 For just as the lightning comes from the east and flashes even to the west, so will the coming of the Son of Man be.
#11
Posted 2013-May-31, 04:21
32519, on 2013-May-31, 00:05, said:
So these are the words of Jesus? LOL his own followers didn't take much notice did they.
#12
Posted 2013-May-31, 08:43
32519, on 2013-May-31, 00:05, said:
"Then if anyone says to you, 'Behold, here is the Christ,' or ' There He is,' do not believe him.
I have followed this recommendation.
#13
Posted 2013-May-31, 08:49
-gwnn
#15
Posted 2013-May-31, 09:22
#17
Posted 2013-August-20, 06:35
32519, on 2013-August-19, 23:10, said:
It sounds like satire to me. Atoms/particles spontaneously and continuously gaining mass? And not word of explanation of how this could happen, or even a link to more detailed discussion.
-gwnn
#18
Posted 2013-August-20, 06:40
32519, on 2013-August-19, 23:10, said:
Apart from the obviously misleading title, this would be another blow to the favourite argument of many apologetics, the Kalam cosmological argument.
George Carlin
#19
Posted 2013-August-20, 10:27
#20
Posted 2013-August-20, 11:59
http://arxiv.org/abs/1303.6878/
and especially
http://www.nature.co...panding-1.13379
My guess is that this view will not catch on except, perhaps, as an entertainment. But who knows? I gather that testing this explanation presents problems.
I was reminded of the old observation "There is no such thing as gravity, the earth just sucks".