BBO Discussion Forums: They pre-empted our NT - BBO Discussion Forums

Jump to content

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

They pre-empted our NT How do we defend?

#1 User is offline   Hanoi5 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 4,082
  • Joined: 2006-August-31
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Santiago, Chile
  • Interests:Bridge, Video Games, Languages, Travelling.

Posted 2015-January-06, 11:10



How do you propose the N/S hands be bid?

 wyman, on 2012-May-04, 09:48, said:

Also, he rates to not have a heart void when he leads the ♥3.


 rbforster, on 2012-May-20, 21:04, said:

Besides playing for fun, most people also like to play bridge to win


My YouTube Channel
0

#2 User is offline   MrAce 

  • VIP Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 6,971
  • Joined: 2009-November-14
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Houston, TX

Posted 2015-January-06, 11:40

First I would treat N hand as 1 suiter after NT opening and start 4♦ if it is IMPs. Rest of it depends on agreements but I don't think finding slam is difficult after that. Missing grandslam or ending up in non making grandslam due to misguess is possible.

At MP, I would start with 4♠ showing 2 suiter and try to land in hearts if we have a fit.

I am sure good pdships in forums have better agreements, but these 2 would be my general approach w/o agreements.
"Genius has its own limitations, however stupidity has no such boundaries!"
"It's only when a mosquito lands on your testicles that you realize there is always a way to solve problems without using violence!"

"Well to be perfectly honest, in my humble opinion, of course without offending anyone who thinks differently from my point of view, but also by looking into this matter in a different perspective and without being condemning of one's view's and by trying to make it objectified, and by considering each and every one's valid opinion, I honestly believe that I completely forgot what I was going to say."
2

#3 User is offline   ArtK78 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 7,786
  • Joined: 2004-September-05
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Galloway NJ USA
  • Interests:Bridge, Poker, participatory and spectator sports.
    Occupation - Tax Attorney in Atlantic City, NJ.

Posted 2015-January-06, 11:46

Punting 6♦ is not unreasonable on the North hand. After the 3♠ bid, it is less likely that partner has significant values in spades.
2

#4 User is offline   Zelandakh 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 10,699
  • Joined: 2006-May-18
  • Gender:Not Telling

Posted 2015-January-06, 14:00

View PostHanoi5, on 2015-January-06, 11:10, said:

How do you propose the N/S hands be bid?

4♣ = diamonds; 4♦ = hearts; 4♥ = hearts + minor; 4♠ = clubs seems like a good starting point, although I think the more common agreement here is "switch".
(-: Zel :-)
0

#5 User is offline   whereagles 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 14,900
  • Joined: 2004-May-11
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Portugal
  • Interests:Everything!

Posted 2015-January-06, 14:12

There is no scientific way to bid this. So try a practical 6♦ (or 5NT pick-a-slam if you prefer).
0

#6 User is offline   jallerton 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 1,796
  • Joined: 2008-September-12
  • Gender:Male

Posted 2015-January-06, 17:20

View PostZelandakh, on 2015-January-06, 14:00, said:

4♣ = diamonds; 4♦ = hearts; 4♥ = hearts + minor; 4♠ = clubs seems like a good starting point, although I think the more common agreement here is "switch".


I think the more commom agreement here is "natural"!
1

#7 User is offline   the hog 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 10,728
  • Joined: 2003-March-07
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Laos
  • Interests:Wagner and Bridge

Posted 2015-January-06, 22:57

I start with 4S to show a big 2 suiter. I will not treat a 7-5 as a 1 suiter.
"The King of Hearts a broadsword bears, the Queen of Hearts a rose." W. H. Auden.
0

#8 User is offline   aguahombre 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 12,029
  • Joined: 2009-February-21
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:St. George, UT

Posted 2015-January-07, 00:00

And to answer the subtitle, "How do we defend?"... We don't.

Think I will join the 6♦ bashers; and I hate bashing.
"Bidding Spades to show spades can work well." (Kenberg)
0

#9 User is offline   Free 

  • mmm Duvel
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 10,728
  • Joined: 2003-July-30
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Belgium
  • Interests:Duvel, Whisky

Posted 2015-January-15, 01:29

I play Leaping Michaels in this case, with adjusted strength. So I have an easy 4♦ call to start with, showing a GF hand with 5+♥ and 5+♦.
"It may be rude to leave to go to the bathroom, but it's downright stupid to sit there and piss yourself" - blackshoe
0
Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users