RHO opened 3D, I passed and my partner made a takeoutdouble in fourth position.
With Kxxx Qxxxxx Kx xx I bid 4D asking partner to pick a major but he bid 4NT.
He took my 4D as forcing with an unknown distribution. I never heard of that as
I always used quebidding opponents minor on the fourlevel as pick a major.
Now I just want to know which bidding is most common.
Page 1 of 1
Choose a major
#2
Posted 2014-November-09, 06:51
Most good players I know of use 4♦ as pick-a-major.
It is also common to play with 13 cards, not 14
It is also common to play with 13 cards, not 14

#3
Posted 2014-November-09, 08:14
I think it is slightly better that 4♦ shows any 2 places to play, not necessarily both majors.
For example 4♦ is fine with 4225 , planning to bid 4♠ over 4♥ from partner , offering a choice between spades and clubs.
For example 4♦ is fine with 4225 , planning to bid 4♠ over 4♥ from partner , offering a choice between spades and clubs.
#4
Posted 2014-November-09, 16:34
mich-b, on 2014-November-09, 08:14, said:
I think it is slightly better that 4♦ shows any 2 places to play, not necessarily both majors.
For example 4♦ is fine with 4225 , planning to bid 4♠ over 4♥ from partner , offering a choice between spades and clubs.
For example 4♦ is fine with 4225 , planning to bid 4♠ over 4♥ from partner , offering a choice between spades and clubs.
Good idea, but partner must bid on the assumption that it shows majors (you will correct if he bids the wrong one): any minimum double with good enough clubs to insist on them should have overcalled clubs instead. (3♦-X-(P)-4♦-(P)-5♣ should imply good clubs with substantial extra value--too good to overcall. Partner will boost this to six almost any time clubs is one of his two suits--though he might pass if he is very ashamed of his 4♦ bid.
#5
Posted 2014-November-09, 17:12
whereagles, on 2014-November-09, 06:51, said:
Most good players I know of use 4♦ as pick-a-major.
It is also common to play with 13 cards, not 14
It is also common to play with 13 cards, not 14

13 cards is optional. Pick a major (with M/m 2-suit correction possible) is not optional...can't imagine any other useful meaning.
"Bidding Spades to show spades can work well." (Kenberg)
#6
Posted 2014-November-09, 18:59
UdcaDenny, on 2014-November-08, 22:07, said:
RHO opened 3D, I passed and my partner made a takeoutdouble in fourth position. With
♠ K x x x ♥ Q x x x x x ♦ K x ♣ x x [ less one card]
I bid 4D asking partner to pick a major but he bid 4NT. He took my 4D as forcing with an unknown distribution. I never heard of that as I always used quebidding opponents minor on the fourlevel as pick a major. Now I just want to know which bidding is most common.
♠ K x x x ♥ Q x x x x x ♦ K x ♣ x x [ less one card]
I bid 4D asking partner to pick a major but he bid 4NT. He took my 4D as forcing with an unknown distribution. I never heard of that as I always used quebidding opponents minor on the fourlevel as pick a major. Now I just want to know which bidding is most common.

#7
Posted 2014-November-09, 19:10
mikestar13, on 2014-November-09, 16:34, said:
Good idea, but partner must bid on the assumption that it shows majors (you will correct if he bids the wrong one): any minimum double with good enough clubs to insist on them should have overcalled clubs instead. (3♦-X-(P)-4♦-(P)-5♣ should imply good clubs with substantial extra value--too good to overcall. Partner will boost this to six almost any time clubs is one of his two suits--though he might pass if he is very ashamed of his 4♦ bid.
Nice. Except, my 4D bid can be very bad, and I am not ashamed

"Bidding Spades to show spades can work well." (Kenberg)
Page 1 of 1