BBO Discussion Forums: 5 level was not safe, ATB - BBO Discussion Forums

Jump to content

  • 2 Pages +
  • 1
  • 2
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

5 level was not safe, ATB

#21 User is offline   kgr 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 3,429
  • Joined: 2003-April-11

Posted 2013-January-06, 06:43

...only questions:
- Game before slam, so it is best to play 3 here as another game-try? (so 3 is either a game try or Slam interest).
- Responder bids 3 with minimum, 4 with almost minimum, 3NT non-serious with some extras (in case opener has a slam interest), Cue with slam interest.
- If responder cues over 3: f.i. responder bids 4, should opener always cooperate, also if 3 was a game-try (then responder can only cue with a slam-interest opposite an almost minimum opener) or should opener only cooperate if he has a slam interest himself?
...or if responder cues, opener cooperates and responder bids 4 then this shows a 'polite cue' (good hand opposite a slam interest of opener, but only game interest if opener had a game-try).
...but then if responder cues 4, opener cues 4: what is 4 by responder?: does this deny -control or does this show the 'polite cue'?
0

  • 2 Pages +
  • 1
  • 2
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

6 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 6 guests, 0 anonymous users