BBO Discussion Forums: JTA = "Judge the Actions" - BBO Discussion Forums

Jump to content

  • 2 Pages +
  • 1
  • 2
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

JTA = "Judge the Actions" Let's just assess, not "blame"...

#21 User is offline   dkham 

  • PipPipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 181
  • Joined: 2008-December-03
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Glasgow

Posted 2012-April-20, 05:51

Thanks!
0

#22 User is offline   han 

  • Under bidder
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 11,797
  • Joined: 2004-July-25
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Amsterdam, the Netherlands

Posted 2012-April-20, 09:11

2H seems absolutely normal to me.
Please note: I am interested in boring, bog standard, 2/1.

- hrothgar
0

#23 User is offline   petterb 

  • PipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 86
  • Joined: 2009-March-04

Posted 2012-April-20, 15:34

 phil_20686, on 2012-April-20, 05:46, said:

You just have to avoid losing more than two diamonds, accomplished by leading past the Kx to the J and A, then duck to the K.

Well, if North plays a normal looking high heart from hand at trick 3, then 4♥ goes down.
0

#24 User is offline   Statto 

  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 636
  • Joined: 2011-December-01
  • Gender:Not Telling
  • Location:UK
  • Interests:Bridge, Poker, but not in conflation.
    Statistics, but not massaged by the media.

Posted 2012-April-21, 22:53

 gnasher, on 2012-April-19, 15:01, said:

I think North's 2♥ is OK. It has too much playing strength to pass and too much defence for a preempt, so that makes it a 2♥ bid.

Maybe I need to go to Specsavers, but I don't see much defence in the North hand. It also looks far too weak for a 2♥ overcall to me, but NV looks ok for 3♥.
A perfection of means, and confusion of aims, seems to be our main problem – Albert Einstein
0
  • 2 Pages +
  • 1
  • 2
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users