You arrive in 6♦ after an unscientific auction. North leads the ♦6, plan the play.
Play 6 Diamonds Teams
#1
Posted 2012-April-03, 16:31
You arrive in 6♦ after an unscientific auction. North leads the ♦6, plan the play.
#2
Posted 2012-April-03, 17:04
Stiff QH
3-3 h break
clb finesse.
I suppose there might be some sort of squeeze to try for.
finesse spade
win clb return
run diamonds.
have no idea how likely that is too win.
#3
Posted 2012-April-03, 17:17
mike777, on 2012-April-03, 17:04, said:
Stiff QH
3-3 h break
clb finesse.
I suppose there might be some sort of squeeze to try for.
finesse spade
win clb return
run diamonds.
have no idea how likely that is too win.
I can't see a way to improve on that and make it just north of 80% because I think you'll also have the chance of a 4 2 break with two of the QT9 in the doubleton.
#4
Posted 2012-April-03, 17:33
s
you've only lost out on the prospect of a stiff Q of hearts versus the other lines mentioned.
if it is covered, try to drop the doubleton 10 or 9 and failing that try for 3-3.
#5
Posted 2012-April-03, 17:33
The alternative is to simply take two ruffing finesses in spades which is 75%.
Seems like it is close.
Winner - BBO Challenge bracket #6 - February, 2017.
#6
Posted 2012-April-03, 17:47
#7
Posted 2012-April-03, 17:49
#8
Posted 2012-April-03, 17:52
Fluffy, on 2012-April-03, 17:49, said:
i think having the jack and 87 of hearts massively improves matters from just ducking one.
#9
Posted 2012-April-03, 19:07
Win diamond lead. Draw remaining trump (Trump can't be worse than 4-1, else North would have led ♦ 10).
Play a ♠ to the ♠ A. Run the ♠ J.
Reenter Dummy with a ♥. Run the ♠ 10.
Hand makes 75% of the time plus the almost infinitesimal amount that either ♠ honor drops when the ♠ A is played.
#10
Posted 2012-April-03, 19:13
mike777, on 2012-April-03, 17:47, said:
36% + (1-36% x 50%) = 68%
(in essence)
Winner - BBO Challenge bracket #6 - February, 2017.
#11
Posted 2012-April-03, 19:13
good post to remind us how to calculate combine odds thanks.
#12
Posted 2012-April-03, 19:15
wyman, on 2012-May-04, 09:48, said:
rbforster, on 2012-May-20, 21:04, said:
My YouTube Channel
#14
Posted 2012-April-04, 05:05
#15
Posted 2012-April-05, 15:45
When South shows out, Ruff in hand play AC and then run of the diamonds hope to either triple squeeze north or on the last diamond you pull a double squeeze.
#16
Posted 2012-April-05, 16:31
I think that the duck is entirely reasonable and, in fact, correct...unless partner has the club A, splitting is tantamount to surrender (at imps) but, still, few players will be able to do it.
Edit: for those who howl that nobody would split, let me point out that this is the I/A forum and that I am certain, from having played against a lot of I/A players, that most would split.
Btw, I wouldn't draw any inference from the failure to lead a spade honour....on this auction, who would lead the K from KQ.
So the spade play always works whenever any honour is with S and (against most opps) whenever S has no honour! That makes it well over 75% in most real life situations.
#17
Posted 2012-April-05, 16:46
- billw55
#18
Posted 2012-April-05, 21:44
As you can see, the ♠ double finesse works, where going after ♥ and falling back on the ♣ finesse doesn't.
At the table, both sides went after ♥, but one made when North failed to cover the ♥J.
Quartic asks "You arrive in 6♦ after an unscientific auction. North leads the ♦6, plan the play."
Agree with rmnka447: At teams, cash ♦AKQJ87, discarding a ♣, a ♠, and then ♥. Unless something remarkable happens, ruff-finesse spades.