Good or bad hand?
#1
Posted 2004-October-29, 14:33
Vul: EW
sitting south, you hold:
S: K
H: KXXXX
D: QX
C: QXXXX
PD open 2N, what is ur plan? suppose u play xfer, but no further agreement.
#2
Posted 2004-October-29, 14:47
flytoox, on Oct 29 2004, 03:33 PM, said:
No further agreements, huh? I guess I'll transfer, then bid 4 clubs, which I refuse to believe partner will pass. If he then bids 4 hearts I'll bid 5.
I guess the only problem will occur if he thinks 4 clubs is Gerber.
Not a very expert or scientific bidding, but hey, with an unfamiliar partner I'm not interested in getting cute.
#3
Posted 2004-October-29, 15:20
To avoid these its better to try these: 3♦-3♥-3NT
Yes, partner will pass with 2♥ and 6♣ can be cold, but our hand isn´t really great for slam purposes actually, and the chances of missunderstandings are huge, so I prefer to play slams on a really known fit, of coure reopening 4♥ with 4♠ to show slam interest and 5 card suit.
#4
Posted 2004-October-29, 16:10
1) There's no other way to bid this hand in a natural system except transf + 4C
2) And even if it were a cue, there's plenty of time to make that clear
3) And if you're REALLY afraid of a mix-up, bid transf + 6C.. yes, SIX.
#5
Posted 2004-October-29, 17:00
#6
Posted 2004-October-29, 17:06
#7
Posted 2004-November-09, 01:46
then Gerber 4C for slam;
the last contract will be 6H/6NT.
bridge blog001:
http://cf71632485.spaces.live.com/blog/cns...!1015.entry
bridge blog002:
http://cvl7163cf2485...st-22291-1.html
"You are not thinking. You are merely being logical". - Neils Bohr
#8 Guest_Jlall_*
Posted 2004-November-11, 02:52
#9
Posted 2004-November-11, 03:26
Jlall, on Nov 11 2004, 03:52 AM, said:
Agree with Justin.
#10
Posted 2004-November-11, 04:53
flytoox, on Oct 30 2004, 09:33 AM, said:
Vul: EW
sitting south, you hold:
S: K
H: KXXXX
D: QX
C: QXXXX
PD open 2N, what is ur plan? suppose u play xfer, but no further agreement.
Assuming 2NT is 20-21 (or maybe 20-22 )
I would transfer to ♥ and bid 3NT
I suppose we COULD miss slam with a PERFECTLY fitting hand -- but with a Pickup partner 4♣ COULD be misunderstood , and possibly get us overboard

#11
Posted 2004-November-11, 05:23
The 4C bid might be a problem when you start arranging conventions with pard, like for instance "GERBER over 2NT". Now that's an agreement that might well backfire if you bid 4C here


#12
Posted 2004-November-11, 10:17
#13
Posted 2004-November-11, 10:48

