Big 4x1s is this futile?
#1
Posted 2012-March-21, 16:48
anyone have a structure?
This one befuddled me the other day:
x
AKQx
AKQx
AKxx
and I'm tired of being befuddled.
I'll say it so no one will have to: What a great argument for a forcing club system!!!
Regards and Happy Trails,
Scott Needham
Boulder, Colorado, USA
#2
Posted 2012-March-21, 17:55
#3
Posted 2012-March-21, 18:18
aguahombre, on 2012-March-21, 17:55, said:
Not in any version of Kokish I have seen: doesn't mean one doesn't exist, of course....and if there is one, I'd like to see it.
#4
Posted 2012-March-21, 19:11
It's worth noting that a lot of strong club methods have trouble on these too. Fortunately they are rare.
a.k.a. Appeal Without Merit
#5
Posted 2012-March-22, 07:41
I do disagree with Adam about strong club systems having a problem on these hands. Most of the time you open 1♣ and the bidding comes back to you in ~3 of the short suit; then you double. Even if that does not happen I think most manage to fit in some dedicated rebid to cover the hand type. For me a 1♠ rebid includes strong 3-suiters.
Within a more standard system there is no structure for this that I am aware of other than using the 2♦ opening in some way. If you are willing to do this then there are several possible schemes that can handle this. Otherwise just open 1m on non-gameforcing hands and keep forcing if the bidding comes back or open 2♣ as above on the (very rare) super-strong ones that cannot stand being treated as balanced.
#6
Posted 2012-March-22, 12:51
#7
Posted 2012-March-22, 16:16
a ParadoX (his word) scheme to 2C to handle 4441's.
#8
Posted 2012-March-23, 02:18
dake50, on 2012-March-22, 16:16, said:
a ParadoX (his word) scheme to 2C to handle 4441's.
I suspect you are thinking of Chris Ryall. Here is a link to his 2♣ method with a further link to his 3-suited structure. This is one of the potential solutions to which I alluded earlier.
#10
Posted 2012-March-23, 07:11
2c 2d 3(h/s) shows 4441 short in suit bid p can bid your short suit to
ask for power or 4n to ask for aces or try to place contract.
The same system can also use 4c/4d for the same purpose but runs across
the problematic bypassing of 3n for speculative reasons.
I have also played multi with a strong roman component added just for
these types of hands.
2d
2(h/s)
3(c/d/h/s) all show roman style hands of 22+
2d
2n
4(c/d/h/s) all show roman style hands of 22+
#11
Posted 2012-March-25, 19:43
43 44 43 24
#12
Posted 2012-March-25, 21:08
ahydra, on 2012-March-23, 06:25, said:
ahydra
Plus one.
Or go via Kokish
2C 2D
2H 2S
2N
and lie about 1 point and about it being a balanced hand.
#13
Posted 2012-March-25, 21:15
Furlan, on 2012-March-25, 19:43, said:
With that start, it might be better for responder to go through the singleton for signoff after the suit-below rebid; the advantage would be when direct establishment of trump (forcing) brings key cards in the trump suit into play.