Page 1 of 1
2 passed hands going to the 5 level?
#1
Posted 2011-January-20, 19:09
♠-
♥Q1098
♦KJ10
♣K109753
all vul, IMPs
pass-(pass)-pass-(1♠)
double-(2♥!)-double-(4♠)
??
2♥= 3 ♠ 8-10 HCP
♥Q1098
♦KJ10
♣K109753
all vul, IMPs
pass-(pass)-pass-(1♠)
double-(2♥!)-double-(4♠)
??
2♥= 3 ♠ 8-10 HCP
#2
Posted 2011-January-21, 04:30
Partner's double suggests he has exactly 4 hearts. Maybe he wasn't willing to go to the 3-level by himself and would have passed out 2S. Should we take that as a cue to go to the 5-level now? I would pass, partner's hand can easily be as defensive as QJ10x AJxx xxx xx.
Please note: I am interested in boring, bog standard, 2/1.
- hrothgar
- hrothgar
#3
Posted 2011-January-21, 05:39
Agree. The hand is very defensive, although finding pard with QJTx of spades is a bit lyrical. Pass.
#4
Posted 2011-January-21, 06:23
I`d double with hopes of delivering the message do something intelligent partner I have extra offense and defense.
#5
Posted 2011-January-21, 09:27
I assume this is a lead question any of T♥ , J♦, or T♣ could work but I would try the T♥. I definitely would not lead a trump
"Tell me of your home world, Usul"
the Freman, Chani from the move "Dune"
"I learned long ago, never to wrestle with a pig. You get dirty, and besides, the pig likes it."
George Bernard Shaw
the Freman, Chani from the move "Dune"
"I learned long ago, never to wrestle with a pig. You get dirty, and besides, the pig likes it."
George Bernard Shaw
#7
Posted 2011-January-22, 08:42
I bid the stupid 5♥ catching partner with
♠J10xxx
♥AKxxx
♦xxx
♣-
-200 instead of +200/500
♠J10xxx
♥AKxxx
♦xxx
♣-
-200 instead of +200/500
#8
Posted 2011-January-22, 17:21
Ahem... I'm not sure pard's dbl over 2♥ is adequate. Thing is, he knows you have a spade void. The last thing he wants is to suggest a save over a doomed 4♠.
Sure, he can argue his dbl is "just for the lead", but how are you supposed to guess between his hand and, say,
xxxx
AKJTx
xxx
x
Sure, he can argue his dbl is "just for the lead", but how are you supposed to guess between his hand and, say,
xxxx
AKJTx
xxx
x
#9
Posted 2011-January-23, 05:24
Partner is closer to a 4♥ bid than to a pass of 2♥.
The easiest way to count losers is to line up the people who talk about loser count, and count them. -Kieran Dyke
#10
Posted 2011-January-23, 05:35
Fluffy, on 2011-January-22, 08:42, said:
I bid the stupid 5♥ catching partner with
♠J10xxx
♥AKxxx
♦xxx
♣-
-200 instead of +200/500
♠J10xxx
♥AKxxx
♦xxx
♣-
-200 instead of +200/500
whereagles, on 2011-January-22, 17:21, said:
Ahem... I'm not sure pard's dbl over 2♥ is adequate. Thing is, he knows you have a spade void. The last thing he wants is to suggest a save over a doomed 4♠.
Sure, he can argue his dbl is "just for the lead", but how are you supposed to guess between his hand and, say,
xxxx
AKJTx
xxx
x
Sure, he can argue his dbl is "just for the lead", but how are you supposed to guess between his hand and, say,
xxxx
AKJTx
xxx
x
Both of these hands look like 3H bids to me.
I don't think you should be acting again even opposite a 3H bid. Partner knows you are a passed hand and hence you will be very pure. It's easier than if you weren't a passed hand.
#11
Posted 2011-January-23, 12:27
Well, I might bid 3♥ on the 2nd one. Certainly not on the 1st one, for the reasons mentioned above (not to induce a save).
Page 1 of 1

Help
