BBO Discussion Forums: Sacrifice at teams? - BBO Discussion Forums

Jump to content

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

Sacrifice at teams?

#1 User is offline   Ant590 

  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 749
  • Joined: 2005-July-17
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Melbourne, Australia

Posted 2008-December-12, 06:09

Scoring: IMP


Right hand opponent opens a weak NT (12-14)

(1NT) - pass - (2) - 4
(pass) - pass - (dbl) - pass
(4) - ?

Do you agree with the pass over partner's 4?
What do you choose to do now?
What would redouble from partner be/show?

Edit: I previously had LHO opening, as someone below spotted :rolleyes:
0

#2 User is offline   rogerclee 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 3,214
  • Joined: 2007-December-16
  • Location:Pasadena, CA

Posted 2008-December-12, 06:50

I assume you mean RHO opened a 12-14 NT.

Redouble by partner is not possible.

Now I would pass.
0

#3 User is offline   Free 

  • mmm Duvel
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 10,728
  • Joined: 2003-July-30
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Belgium
  • Interests:Duvel, Whisky

Posted 2008-December-12, 06:56

Do you agree with the pass over partner's 4?
yes

What do you choose to do now?
pass wtp?

What would redouble from partner be/show?
"I'm an idiot: lets preempt and then give opps extra space"
"It may be rude to leave to go to the bathroom, but it's downright stupid to sit there and piss yourself" - blackshoe
0

#4 User is offline   gnasher 

  • Andy Bowles
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 11,993
  • Joined: 2007-May-03
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:London, UK

Posted 2008-December-12, 07:00

If I were going to bid, I'd have done it a round earlier. It's silly to force the opponents to guess, then assume that they've guessed right. On this hand they could be cold for slam or about to do off in game.
... that would still not be conclusive proof, before someone wants to explain that to me as well as if I was a 5 year-old. - gwnn
0

#5 User is offline   Codo 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 6,373
  • Joined: 2003-March-15
  • Location:Hamburg, Germany
  • Interests:games and sports, esp. bridge,chess and (beach-)volleyball

Posted 2008-December-12, 07:13

wtp wtp wnp

translated: Obvious pass both rounds and XX is "want new partner"
Kind Regards

Roland


Sanity Check: Failure (Fluffy)
More system is not the answer...
0

#6 User is offline   OleBerg 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 1,950
  • Joined: 2008-April-05
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Copenhagen
  • Interests:Model-Railways.

Posted 2008-December-12, 09:44

Everybody agrees with me.
_____________________________________

Do not underestimate the power of the dark side. Or the ninth trumph.

Best Regards Ole Berg

_____________________________________

We should always assume 2/1 unless otherwise stated, because:

- If the original poster didn't bother to state his system, that means that he thinks it's obvious what he's playing. The only people who think this are 2/1 players.


Gnasher
0

#7 User is offline   Tomi2 

  • PipPipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 241
  • Joined: 2005-November-07

Posted 2008-December-12, 09:57

Ant590, on Dec 12 2008, 07:09 AM, said:

What would redouble from partner be/show?

if partner redoubled this i'd lead the 2 of dias and say "one down is good bridge"
0

#8 User is offline   Ant590 

  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 749
  • Joined: 2005-July-17
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Melbourne, Australia

Posted 2008-December-12, 10:40

I did indeed pass, and this result was an lost us a few IMPs, which I was happy with as I guess the opps had to find their best strain, which they did.

My partner's opinion was that he had promised 7 clubs and a pre-emptive hand, so it was going down at most three (for a +120 gain) given that I had Ax of clubs. What would you say in defence to my pass?
0

#9 User is offline   Lobowolf 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 2,030
  • Joined: 2008-August-08
  • Interests:Attorney, writer, entertainer.<br><br>Great close-up magicians we have known: Shoot Ogawa, Whit Haydn, Bill Malone, David Williamson, Dai Vernon, Michael Skinner, Jay Sankey, Brian Gillis, Eddie Fechter, Simon Lovell, Carl Andrews.

Posted 2008-December-12, 10:40

gnasher, on Dec 12 2008, 08:00 AM, said:

If I were going to bid, I'd have done it a round earlier. It's silly to force the opponents to guess, then assume that they've guessed right. On this hand they could be cold for slam or about to do off in game.

Seems to be fairly unanimous. I think this post best sums up the most applicable reasoning. I'd add that 5332 distribution with 2 of partner's suit and 3 of theirs doesn't support competing at the 5-level. It's not like a hand with more extreme distribution that might be much more useful on offense than defense.
1. LSAT tutor for rent.

Call me Desdinova...Eternal Light

C. It's the nexus of the crisis and the origin of storms.

IV: ace 333: pot should be game, idk

e: "Maybe God remembered how cute you were as a carrot."
0

#10 User is offline   Lobowolf 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 2,030
  • Joined: 2008-August-08
  • Interests:Attorney, writer, entertainer.<br><br>Great close-up magicians we have known: Shoot Ogawa, Whit Haydn, Bill Malone, David Williamson, Dai Vernon, Michael Skinner, Jay Sankey, Brian Gillis, Eddie Fechter, Simon Lovell, Carl Andrews.

Posted 2008-December-12, 10:41

Ant590, on Dec 12 2008, 11:40 AM, said:

What would you say in defence to my pass?

"All the cool people on BBO Forums agreed with me."
1. LSAT tutor for rent.

Call me Desdinova...Eternal Light

C. It's the nexus of the crisis and the origin of storms.

IV: ace 333: pot should be game, idk

e: "Maybe God remembered how cute you were as a carrot."
0

#11 User is offline   bid_em_up 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 2,351
  • Joined: 2006-March-21
  • Location:North Carolina

Posted 2008-December-12, 11:02

Ant590, on Dec 12 2008, 11:40 AM, said:

My partner's opinion was that he had promised 7 clubs and a pre-emptive hand, so it was going down at most three (for a +120 gain) given that I had Ax of clubs. What would you say in defence to my pass?

Tell partner to take up golf. If he can't subtract 11-7 and come up with down 4, he will never be able to count to 13.
Is the word "pass" not in your vocabulary?
So many experts, not enough X cards.
0

#12 User is offline   FrancesHinden 

  • Limit bidder
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 8,482
  • Joined: 2004-November-02
  • Gender:Female
  • Location:England
  • Interests:Bridge, classical music, skiing... but I spend more time earning a living than doing any of those

Posted 2008-December-12, 11:05

OleBerg, on Dec 12 2008, 03:44 PM, said:

Everybody agrees with me.

No, everyone agrees with me.
0

#13 User is offline   rogerclee 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 3,214
  • Joined: 2007-December-16
  • Location:Pasadena, CA

Posted 2008-December-12, 11:07

Ant590, on Dec 12 2008, 09:40 AM, said:

My partner's opinion was that he had promised 7 clubs and a pre-emptive hand, so it was going down at most three (for a +120 gain) given that I had Ax of clubs.

LOL
0

#14 User is offline   OleBerg 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 1,950
  • Joined: 2008-April-05
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Copenhagen
  • Interests:Model-Railways.

Posted 2008-December-12, 11:43

FrancesHinden, on Dec 12 2008, 07:05 PM, said:

OleBerg, on Dec 12 2008, 03:44 PM, said:

Everybody agrees with me.

No, everyone agrees with me.

I agree.
_____________________________________

Do not underestimate the power of the dark side. Or the ninth trumph.

Best Regards Ole Berg

_____________________________________

We should always assume 2/1 unless otherwise stated, because:

- If the original poster didn't bother to state his system, that means that he thinks it's obvious what he's playing. The only people who think this are 2/1 players.


Gnasher
0

#15 User is offline   cherdano 

  • 5555
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 9,520
  • Joined: 2003-September-04
  • Gender:Male

Posted 2008-December-12, 11:45

Ant590, on Dec 12 2008, 10:40 AM, said:

I did indeed pass, and this result was an lost us a few IMPs, which I was happy with as I guess the opps had to find their best strain, which they did.

My partner's opinion was that he had promised 7 clubs and a pre-emptive hand, so it was going down at most three (for a +120 gain) given that I had Ax of clubs. What would you say in defence to my pass?

I would tell him that making 7 tricks after bidding 5 clubs is down 4.
The easiest way to count losers is to line up the people who talk about loser count, and count them. -Kieran Dyke
0

#16 User is offline   han 

  • Under bidder
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 11,797
  • Joined: 2004-July-25
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Amsterdam, the Netherlands

Posted 2008-December-12, 11:48

You can easily go down 4 (xxx x xx KQJxxxx is a fine white vs red preempt I think).

It's fairly unlikely (but possible) that you beat 4H. I think sacrificing will fairly often win 3, a little less often cost 4 and every once in a while be a terrible disaster. At teams you should not aim t make these close sarifices.

As others have said, a direct 5C has more merit, as the chance that they go wrong will be higher. Then they will sometimes go down in 5H and you'll have a big victory, to cancel the occasional phantom sacrifice.
Please note: I am interested in boring, bog standard, 2/1.

- hrothgar
0

#17 User is offline   Lobowolf 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 2,030
  • Joined: 2008-August-08
  • Interests:Attorney, writer, entertainer.<br><br>Great close-up magicians we have known: Shoot Ogawa, Whit Haydn, Bill Malone, David Williamson, Dai Vernon, Michael Skinner, Jay Sankey, Brian Gillis, Eddie Fechter, Simon Lovell, Carl Andrews.

Posted 2008-December-12, 12:16

Ant590, on Dec 12 2008, 11:40 AM, said:

I did indeed pass, and this result was an lost us a few IMPs, which I was happy with as I guess the opps had to find their best strain, which they did.

My partner's opinion was that he had promised 7 clubs and a pre-emptive hand, so it was going down at most three (for a +120 gain) given that I had Ax of clubs. What would you say in defence to my pass?

On a slightly less facetious note, you might point out that there was no guarantee that 4 was making, and if it went down, then -3 wouldn't be much of a bargain.
1. LSAT tutor for rent.

Call me Desdinova...Eternal Light

C. It's the nexus of the crisis and the origin of storms.

IV: ace 333: pot should be game, idk

e: "Maybe God remembered how cute you were as a carrot."
0

#18 User is offline   P_Marlowe 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 10,983
  • Joined: 2005-March-18
  • Gender:Male

Posted 2008-December-12, 12:54

Pass.

You have no idea, if they have discovered a 4-4 fit.

With kind regards
Marlowe

PS: I would tell partner, that he should not worry about
a gain of 120, if this is our highest loss on any hand, we
will beat them comfortable.
Besides, partner assumed, that they make 4H, which is
not clear at all.
With kind regards
Uwe Gebhardt (P_Marlowe)
0

#19 User is offline   mtvesuvius 

  • Vesuvius the Violent Volcano
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 3,216
  • Joined: 2008-December-04
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Tampa-Area, Florida
  • Interests:SLEEPING

Posted 2008-December-12, 14:33

Ant590, on Dec 12 2008, 12:40 PM, said:

My partner's opinion was that he had promised 7 clubs and a pre-emptive hand, so it was going down at most three (for a +120 gain) given that I had Ax of clubs. What would you say in defence to my pass?

Your defense for pass: "I can count to 13, can you? Go fish."
Yay for the "Ignored Users" feature!
0

#20 User is offline   Fluffy 

  • World International Master without a clue
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 17,404
  • Joined: 2003-November-13
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:madrid

Posted 2008-December-14, 22:07

Aiming for -500 or -200 is not a winning strategy at IMPs.

A good defence is one that you either know your opponents are making game, or you have a chance to make the contract yourself, when none of the above meet you are gambling too much.
0

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users