(3d) ?
#21
Posted 2008-November-12, 03:52
I am born under a lucky star ...
With kind regards
Marlowe
Uwe Gebhardt (P_Marlowe)
#22
Posted 2008-November-12, 11:56
a.k.a. Appeal Without Merit
#23
Posted 2008-November-12, 12:01
awm, on Nov 12 2008, 12:56 PM, said:
That he should almost definitely do.
#24
Posted 2008-November-12, 13:51
jdonn, on Nov 11 2008, 07:02 PM, said:
plize gif statistical evidence
incidently, I pass.
#25
Posted 2008-November-14, 14:34
Quote
Quote
And we do play play that 3m is showing a strong preempt and 2Nt is a m preempt in wich 3Nt isnt likely. And so far opponents are not happy !
Even in standard R vs W
pass-----(P)--------3D--------(P)
Axx
Axx
Qxx
JTxx
Not Bidding 3Nt here is crazy.
For instance, he doesn't like being used as a human shield when we're being shot at.
I happen to think it's a very noble way to meet one's maker, especially for a guy like him.
Bottom line is we never let that difference of opinion interfere with anything."
#26
Posted 2008-November-14, 14:37
benlessard, on Nov 14 2008, 03:34 PM, said:
Quote
Quote
And we do play play that 3m is showing a strong preempt and 2Nt is a m preempt in wich 3Nt isnt likely. And so far opponents are not happy !
Even in standard R vs W
pass-----(P)--------3D--------(P)
Axx
Axx
Qxx
JTxx
Not Bidding 3Nt here is crazy.
What in the world is your point? You bid game on that because partner should have a good long suit and you can easily count your tricks, not because he has shown all kinds of defensive strength or an opening hand or whatever you said before.
Nor do I see what your system has to do with what you are assuming your opponents play.
#27
Posted 2008-November-14, 14:39
#28
Posted 2008-November-14, 15:05
xx,x,KQJTxxx,Axx is IMO what a 3 level R vs W preempt tend to look like.
Traditionnally is was a 7 or 8 playing tricks with a solid suit but if you use 3Nt gambling then the its more likely to have a side A or K and a 1 loser suit or to have extra lenght.
With my hand i expect to go plus more often after 1D than after 3D by RHO.
Its also a matters of what is your balancing style.
Against weaker players ill be more tempted to double since they underestimate the importance of the vulnerability.
For instance, he doesn't like being used as a human shield when we're being shot at.
I happen to think it's a very noble way to meet one's maker, especially for a guy like him.
Bottom line is we never let that difference of opinion interfere with anything."
#29
Posted 2008-November-14, 15:37
I'm not the least bit worried about the opps... it is partner I am worried about..
The good news, and probably what I would say to myself at the table, as I give in to my cowardly instincts, is that we are white... we only lose 6 imps (or so) when we miss game. Red, I think that it is just too dangerous to pass.
BTW, anyone else thinking that 3♥ has some appeal? Not much, mind you, and I wouldn't bid it, but it is easy to see how that could be a big winner (or loser).
#30
Posted 2008-November-14, 16:44
mikeh, on Nov 14 2008, 01:37 PM, said:
That occurred to me immediately, but I just don't think my spots are good enough
#31
Posted 2008-November-14, 17:06
What shape can partner have? I hold 3 cards in ♦ opener should have 6-7. So Partner won't have a lot of ♦'s and if ♠ is his longest suit, than he will have 5+ of them most of the time.

Help
