Add digits
#1
Posted 2008-September-12, 11:25
#2
Posted 2008-September-12, 11:28
#3
Posted 2008-September-12, 11:46
That said, upon further thought I'm going with ...
#4
Posted 2008-September-12, 11:56
Does it matter that I didn't use decimal numbers but that I used the number 4444 as the base of my numerical system?

Rik
The most exciting phrase to hear in science, the one that heralds the new discoveries, is not “Eureka!” (I found it!), but “That’s funny…” – Isaac Asimov
The only reason God did not put "Thou shalt mind thine own business" in the Ten Commandments was that He thought that it was too obvious to need stating. - Kenberg
#6
Posted 2008-September-12, 12:12
PetteriLem, on Sep 12 2008, 09:25 AM, said:
I'm a bit confused by the question.
So we have N = sum of digits of 4444^4444
and M = sum of digits of N?
I know these aren't the correct answers, but just so I understand the question, suppose that:
4444^4444 = 498461316168181646
So then N = 4+9+8+4+6+1+3+1+6+1+6+8+1+8+1+6+4+6 = 83
and M = 8+3 = 11.
Is that the way we are supposed to go about calculating it, assuming we could find the right number for 4444^4444?
#7
Posted 2008-September-12, 12:14
#8
Posted 2008-September-12, 12:58
I have the same answer as Trumpace.
#10
Posted 2008-September-13, 04:00
George Carlin
#11
Posted 2008-September-13, 05:47
EricK, on Sep 13 2008, 03:44 AM, said:
That can't be true, can it? Doesn't it imply that the sum of the digits of any multiple of 9 is 0?
Even if I am mistaken and 9 mod 9 = 9, what of 19? 1 + 9 = 10; 19 mod 9 = 1.
Maybe the sum of the digits of the sum of the digits eventually equals the number mod 9 when carried out enough times so that the sum is less than 10. i.e the sum of the digits for 19 is 10, the sum of those digits is 1 which equals 19 mod 9.
But, the problem stipulated only two steps.
#12
Posted 2008-September-13, 06:40
gwnn, on Sep 13 2008, 10:00 AM, said:
Yes, you are right. It should be 45.
#13
Posted 2008-September-13, 06:52
TimG, on Sep 13 2008, 11:47 AM, said:
EricK, on Sep 13 2008, 03:44 AM, said:
That can't be true, can it? Doesn't it imply that the sum of the digits of any multiple of 9 is 0?
Even if I am mistaken and 9 mod 9 = 9, what of 19? 1 + 9 = 10; 19 mod 9 = 1.
Maybe the sum of the digits of the sum of the digits eventually equals the number mod 9 when carried out enough times so that the sum is less than 10. i.e the sum of the digits for 19 is 10, the sum of those digits is 1 which equals 19 mod 9.
But, the problem stipulated only two steps.
I meant that a number and the sum of its digits are congruent to each other modulo 9 (i.e. leave the same remainder upon dividing by 9) or in more general terms:
Let N be a positive integer and let D be the sum of the digits of the representation of N in base b. Then N≡D(mod b-1)
This means, when applied to the problem in the OP, that 4444^4444, the sum of the digits of 4444^4444, the sum of the digits of that number, the sum of the digits of that number and so on, all leave the same remainder upon dividing by 9. Which, as can be easily shown, is 7. The second half of the proof showed that 7 itself was the only option for the sum of the digits of M because the next option, 16 was already too high.
#14
Posted 2008-September-13, 18:26
TimG, on Sep 12 2008, 01:03 PM, said:
I was mistakenly trying to solve the problem for 4^4444. Probably still wrong...