BBO Discussion Forums: Add digits - BBO Discussion Forums

Jump to content

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

Add digits

#1 User is offline   PetteriLem 

  • PipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 53
  • Joined: 2007-January-05

Posted 2008-September-12, 11:25

Let N be the sum of 4444 to power 4444 digits and M the sum of N's digits. What is the sum of M's digits?
0

#2 User is offline   Trumpace 

  • Hideous Rabbit
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 1,040
  • Joined: 2005-January-22
  • Gender:Male

Posted 2008-September-12, 11:28

This is an old International Math Olympiad problem, and if I recall correctly, the answer is ..
Spoiler
..
0

#3 User is offline   G_R__E_G 

  • PipPipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 343
  • Joined: 2005-May-26
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Canada

Posted 2008-September-12, 11:46

My first instinct is the smart ass reply of "L". Of course, my first instinct is most often the smart assed response.

That said, upon further thought I'm going with ...
Spoiler
.
Visit my club website www.midlanddbc.com
0

#4 User is offline   Trinidad 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 4,531
  • Joined: 2005-October-09
  • Location:Netherlands

Posted 2008-September-12, 11:56

The sum is 1.

Does it matter that I didn't use decimal numbers but that I used the number 4444 as the base of my numerical system?

:)

Rik
I want my opponents to leave my table with a smile on their face and without matchpoints on their score card - in that order.
The most exciting phrase to hear in science, the one that heralds the new discoveries, is not “Eureka!” (I found it!), but “That’s funny…” – Isaac Asimov
The only reason God did not put "Thou shalt mind thine own business" in the Ten Commandments was that He thought that it was too obvious to need stating. - Kenberg
0

#5 User is offline   TimG 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 3,972
  • Joined: 2004-July-25
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Maine, USA

Posted 2008-September-12, 12:03

I'm going with ...
Spoiler
...
0

#6 User is offline   Echognome 

  • Deipnosophist
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 4,386
  • Joined: 2005-March-22

Posted 2008-September-12, 12:12

PetteriLem, on Sep 12 2008, 09:25 AM, said:

Let N be the sum of 4444 to power 4444 digits and M the sum of N's digits. What is the sum of M's digits?

I'm a bit confused by the question.

So we have N = sum of digits of 4444^4444
and M = sum of digits of N?

I know these aren't the correct answers, but just so I understand the question, suppose that:

4444^4444 = 498461316168181646

So then N = 4+9+8+4+6+1+3+1+6+1+6+8+1+8+1+6+4+6 = 83
and M = 8+3 = 11.

Is that the way we are supposed to go about calculating it, assuming we could find the right number for 4444^4444?
"Half the people you know are below average." - Steven Wright
0

#7 User is offline   TimG 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 3,972
  • Joined: 2004-July-25
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Maine, USA

Posted 2008-September-12, 12:14

I was confused by the wording, too, but interpreted it the same way as you, so I guess it wasn't as unclear as we thought.
0

#8 User is offline   naresh301 

  • PipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 19
  • Joined: 2007-October-02

Posted 2008-September-12, 12:58

I'm pretty sure I've seen this or a very similar math olympiad problem. Gnome and TimG's interpretations are correct (if M=11, the answer would be 2).

I have the same answer as Trumpace.
0

#9 User is offline   EricK 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 2,303
  • Joined: 2003-February-14
  • Location:England

Posted 2008-September-13, 02:44

I agree with the answers given already.

Hidden working:
Spoiler

0

#10 User is offline   gwnn 

  • Csaba the Hutt
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 13,027
  • Joined: 2006-June-16
  • Gender:Male
  • Interests:bye

Posted 2008-September-13, 04:00

Eric, I think you're wrong about your 41, it should be 45. Of course that doesn't make your final answer wrong. Very nice solution btw.
... and I can prove it with my usual, flawless logic.
      George Carlin
0

#11 User is offline   TimG 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 3,972
  • Joined: 2004-July-25
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Maine, USA

Posted 2008-September-13, 05:47

EricK, on Sep 13 2008, 03:44 AM, said:

The sum of the digits of a number is equal to the number modulo 9.

That can't be true, can it? Doesn't it imply that the sum of the digits of any multiple of 9 is 0?

Even if I am mistaken and 9 mod 9 = 9, what of 19? 1 + 9 = 10; 19 mod 9 = 1.

Maybe the sum of the digits of the sum of the digits eventually equals the number mod 9 when carried out enough times so that the sum is less than 10. i.e the sum of the digits for 19 is 10, the sum of those digits is 1 which equals 19 mod 9.

But, the problem stipulated only two steps.
0

#12 User is offline   EricK 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 2,303
  • Joined: 2003-February-14
  • Location:England

Posted 2008-September-13, 06:40

gwnn, on Sep 13 2008, 10:00 AM, said:

Eric, I think you're wrong about your 41, it should be 45. Of course that doesn't make your final answer wrong. Very nice solution btw.

Yes, you are right. It should be 45.
0

#13 User is offline   EricK 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 2,303
  • Joined: 2003-February-14
  • Location:England

Posted 2008-September-13, 06:52

TimG, on Sep 13 2008, 11:47 AM, said:

EricK, on Sep 13 2008, 03:44 AM, said:

The sum of the digits of a number is equal to the number modulo 9.

That can't be true, can it? Doesn't it imply that the sum of the digits of any multiple of 9 is 0?

Even if I am mistaken and 9 mod 9 = 9, what of 19? 1 + 9 = 10; 19 mod 9 = 1.

Maybe the sum of the digits of the sum of the digits eventually equals the number mod 9 when carried out enough times so that the sum is less than 10. i.e the sum of the digits for 19 is 10, the sum of those digits is 1 which equals 19 mod 9.

But, the problem stipulated only two steps.

I meant that a number and the sum of its digits are congruent to each other modulo 9 (i.e. leave the same remainder upon dividing by 9) or in more general terms:

Let N be a positive integer and let D be the sum of the digits of the representation of N in base b. Then N≡D(mod b-1)

This means, when applied to the problem in the OP, that 4444^4444, the sum of the digits of 4444^4444, the sum of the digits of that number, the sum of the digits of that number and so on, all leave the same remainder upon dividing by 9. Which, as can be easily shown, is 7. The second half of the proof showed that 7 itself was the only option for the sum of the digits of M because the next option, 16 was already too high.
0

#14 User is offline   TimG 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 3,972
  • Joined: 2004-July-25
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Maine, USA

Posted 2008-September-13, 18:26

TimG, on Sep 12 2008, 01:03 PM, said:

I'm going with ...
Spoiler
...

I was mistakenly trying to solve the problem for 4^4444. Probably still wrong...
0

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users