Help
xx
xxx
T7432
Jxx
2♣*-p-2♦*-X
p-?
2♣ was weak with diamonds or any strong hand
2♦ was p/c
X was t/o of diamonds
pass showed diamonds from opener.
if you bid 2♥, partner will bid 3♦. What now? MP's all white
Page 1 of 1
diamonds... :(
#1
- Csaba the Hutt
-
- Group: Advanced Members
- Posts: 13,027
- Joined: 2006-June-16
- Gender:Male
- Interests:bye
Posted 2008-July-20, 01:15
... and I can prove it with my usual, flawless logic.
George Carlin
George Carlin
#3
- Group: Advanced Members
- Posts: 1,962
- Joined: 2007-September-14
- Location:Australia
- Interests:The Universe, Traveling, Squash, and Scandinavia.
Posted 2008-July-20, 06:10
agree with the obvious 2H and 3H
- Andy -
We are all connected to each other biologically, to the Earth chemically, and to the rest of the universe atomically.
We're in the universe, and the universe is in us.
We are all connected to each other biologically, to the Earth chemically, and to the rest of the universe atomically.
We're in the universe, and the universe is in us.
#4
- Andy Bowles
-
- Group: Advanced Members
- Posts: 11,993
- Joined: 2007-May-03
- Gender:Male
- Location:London, UK
Posted 2008-July-21, 07:21
2♥ then 3NT. Partner is going to drive game whatever I do, so I may as well go for nine tricks rather than ten. It is unlikely that partner will pass 3NT with a void - 4306 is about the only shape where this is likely, and with ♦AKQJxx they might have opened at the one-level, so I don't expect to lose lots of diamond tricks in 3NT.
... that would still not be conclusive proof, before someone wants to explain that to me as well as if I was a 5 year-old. - gwnn
Page 1 of 1