BBO Discussion Forums: simple question - BBO Discussion Forums

Jump to content

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

simple question my favorite geometry problems

#1 User is offline   gwnn 

  • Csaba the Hutt
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 13,027
  • Joined: 2006-June-16
  • Gender:Male
  • Interests:bye

Posted 2007-November-08, 00:39

1. Arrange 6 points in a plane so as any 3 points form an isosceles triangle.

2. Arrange 6 points in a plane so any point has at least 3 "neighbors".

neighbor=a point located exactly at a unit distance. (the same unit for all points)

for example, in a regular hexagon every point has 2 neighbors.
... and I can prove it with my usual, flawless logic.
      George Carlin
0

#2 User is offline   jikl 

  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 558
  • Joined: 2004-October-08
  • Location:Victoria, Australia

Posted 2007-November-08, 03:24

Interesting question, depends on definitions i am too lazy to look up, my easy answer without research is 5 points in xyz and one somewhere else.

Sean
0

#3 User is offline   Blofeld 

  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 775
  • Joined: 2005-May-05
  • Location:Oxford
  • Interests:mathematics, science fiction, Tolkien, go, fencing, word games, board games, bad puns, juggling, Mornington Crescent, philosophy, Tom Lehrer, rock climbing, jootsing, drinking tea, plotting to take over the world, croquet . . . and most other things, really.

Posted 2007-November-08, 03:32

Nice problems!

I think to make the second problem more interesting, you should specify that the points must be distinct (before I found a solution with them distinct, I wondered if this was a trick).

A similar problem I've seen (though with very little overlap in the solution): how many essentially different[1] ways are there to arrange four points in a plane such that the distance between pairs of points only takes two values?

[1] Up to translation, rotation and (uniform) rescaling (there's a word for that, but I can't remember what it is).
0

#4 User is offline   Fluffy 

  • World International Master without a clue
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 17,404
  • Joined: 2003-November-13
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:madrid

Posted 2007-November-08, 10:38

Blofeld, on Nov 8 2007, 09:32 AM, said:

I think to make the second problem more interesting, you should specify that the points must be distinct (before I found a solution with them distinct, I wondered if this was a trick).

I also though the same, put all the points on same position :)
0

#5 User is offline   Fluffy 

  • World International Master without a clue
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 17,404
  • Joined: 2003-November-13
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:madrid

Posted 2007-November-12, 05:04

I had to almost demostrate number 2 was not possible, squeeezing all posible conection options untill I came to the answer, hell it was so damn simple :(.
0

#6 User is offline   gwnn 

  • Csaba the Hutt
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 13,027
  • Joined: 2006-June-16
  • Gender:Male
  • Interests:bye

Posted 2007-November-12, 07:28

Fluffy, on Nov 12 2007, 01:04 PM, said:

I had to almost demostrate number 2 was not possible, squeeezing all posible conection options untill I came to the answer, hell it was so damn simple :(.

That was my "method" too :)

But it took me about 3 weeks or so I think. :)
... and I can prove it with my usual, flawless logic.
      George Carlin
0

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users