BBO Discussion Forums: responding to TO double after WJS - BBO Discussion Forums

Jump to content

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

responding to TO double after WJS

#1 User is offline   goobers 

  • PipPipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 372
  • Joined: 2006-December-04

Posted 2007-April-03, 16:46

(1) - x - (2) - ?

Holding

Kx xxxx AKxx xxx

What would you bid?
0

#2 User is offline   pclayton 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 9,151
  • Joined: 2003-June-11
  • Location:Southern California

Posted 2007-April-03, 16:51

Double for takeout is a great bid here....

Unfortunately double is penalty.

So I'll bid 3.5 hearts.
"Phil" on BBO
0

#3 User is offline   pbleighton 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 3,153
  • Joined: 2003-February-28

Posted 2007-April-03, 16:54

I would bid yuk :lol:

3H, 4H, 3D, and 4D could all be right.

I'm going to count on partner having 4 hearts but not necessarily 4 diamonds, and bid 3H. The SK looks good, but it may well get ruffed away on the second trick.

Peter
0

#4 User is offline   goobers 

  • PipPipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 372
  • Joined: 2006-December-04

Posted 2007-April-03, 17:04

Yeah, I assume double would be penalty, as partner has shown length in spades.

My worry was that if 3 or 3 should show more than 4 cards.
0

#5 User is offline   badderzboy 

  • PipPipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 450
  • Joined: 2003-June-08

Posted 2007-April-03, 17:07

Anyone for 3s as I want to bid I have values don't know which red suit u have?

Steve
0

#6 User is offline   mikeh 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 13,711
  • Joined: 2005-June-15
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Canada
  • Interests:Bridge, golf, wine (red), cooking, reading eclectically but insatiably, travelling, making bad posts.

Posted 2007-April-03, 17:09

3 is enough: I see no fractional upside to the hand... if anything, it is perhaps worth only 2.88... but fractional bidding is an idea whose time has not yet come.

Partner will (usually) bid on if game is good, and sometimes when it ain't.

Anyone use 2N as lebonsohl here? Not suggesting that this is the hand for it, but if it were available, then all the more reason to stay with 3, since with purely competitive interest, one would bid 2N then 3 (I assume)
'one of the great markers of the advance of human kindness is the howls you will hear from the Men of God' Johann Hari
0

#7 User is offline   skjaeran 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 3,727
  • Joined: 2006-June-05
  • Location:Oslo, Norway
  • Interests:Bridge, sports, Sci-fi, fantasy

Posted 2007-April-04, 01:06

3 for me.
K is of dubious value. So 3 is more apt to be a slight overbid than an underbid.
Kind regards,
Harald
0

#8 User is offline   helene_t 

  • The Abbess
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 17,398
  • Joined: 2004-April-22
  • Gender:Female
  • Location:Odense, Denmark
  • Interests:History, languages

Posted 2007-April-04, 01:42

3 means 3.5 hearts, since if I wanted to bid 2.5 hearts I would have scrambled with 2NT. So I bid 3.
The world would be such a happy place, if only everyone played Acol :) --- TramTicket
0

#9 User is offline   whereagles 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 14,900
  • Joined: 2004-May-11
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Portugal
  • Interests:Everything!

Posted 2007-April-04, 03:01

An FTL evaluation reveals that 4 should have some play for, so that's what I bid. Incidently, after RHO's bid, the likelyhood of pard having 4 hearts increases.
0

#10 User is offline   kenberg 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 11,277
  • Joined: 2004-September-22
  • Location:Northern Maryland

Posted 2007-April-04, 08:15

3H. Playing there and taking ten tricks is a significant danger but I think 4H on my own requires too much faith.

I am not so worried about a spade to the ace and a spade back ruffed. This could happen but QJT9xx on my right is actually a better holding for 2S than Axxxxx or even the unlikely (not enough points to go around) AQxxxx. With QJT9xx he can reasonably expect to lose two spades and take four on offense but take no tricks on defense. QJT8xx may well work also, and a gamble with QJTxxx is not out of the question. I think clubs are the bigger danger. With my highs, pard's highs, rho's spades, it is very possible the defense will begin with AK and another club. If partner and rho each hold two clubs I won't like this. If I were confident partner had a stiff club I think I would give 4H a shot. If partner holds AQxx of hearts I can hook the Q and cash ace, hope for 3-2, leave the last heart out and start a cash and ruff in the side suits. Not that far-fetched. Also not what you would call a sure thing.

Anyway, I bid 3H. Partner, with a stiff club, the ace of spades, and decent hearts, might go 4 and I might make it.

By the way: What's FTL?
Ken
0

#11 User is offline   Apollo81 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 3,162
  • Joined: 2006-July-10
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Maryland

Posted 2007-April-04, 08:36

mikeh, on Apr 3 2007, 07:09 PM, said:

3 is enough: I see no fractional upside to the hand... if anything, it is perhaps worth only 2.88... but fractional bidding is an idea whose time has not yet come.

Partner will (usually) bid on if game is good, and sometimes when it ain't.

Anyone use 2N as lebonsohl here? Not suggesting that this is the hand for it, but if it were available, then all the more reason to stay with 3, since with purely competitive interest, one would bid 2N then 3 (I assume)

I agree with this, although I put the hand's value at closer to 2.98 =)
0

#12 User is offline   whereagles 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 14,900
  • Joined: 2004-May-11
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Portugal
  • Interests:Everything!

Posted 2007-April-04, 12:39

kenberg, on Apr 4 2007, 02:15 PM, said:

By the way: What's FTL?

Fought The Law. A book by lawrence and wirgen which criticizes the law of total tricks and proposes alternative schemes.
0

#13 User is offline   kenberg 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 11,277
  • Joined: 2004-September-22
  • Location:Northern Maryland

Posted 2007-April-04, 18:07

I keep meaning to read that book. I hadn't realized it had acronymed. Most decisions in life and in bridge have to be made with insufficient information. As far as LOTT is concerned, in this case it is more or less unusable. I don't know how many hearts we have combined (8 probably) I don't know how many spades they have combined (7 or maybe 8), I guess they have at least 8 clubs combined, but maybe 9. So the trick total is approximately, on average, the trump total and I can only guess at the trump total which may or may not be the trick total. I have not studied FTL yet but generally I am skeptical. I am a mathematician and this gives me a healthy respect for the limitations of formulas. The area of a circle really is Pi* r^2, but this only helps if you are able to determine r.
Ken
0

#14 User is offline   whereagles 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 14,900
  • Joined: 2004-May-11
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Portugal
  • Interests:Everything!

Posted 2007-April-04, 23:35

That book is incredibly boring, but the stuff is good.
0

#15 User is offline   the hog 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 10,728
  • Joined: 2003-March-07
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Laos
  • Interests:Wagner and Bridge

Posted 2007-April-05, 04:10

3H. Haven't played Lebensohl in this situation, but like Helene, I have played "scrambling". 3H thus shows a bit more than going via 2NT.
"The King of Hearts a broadsword bears, the Queen of Hearts a rose." W. H. Auden.
0

#16 User is offline   jdonn 

  • - - T98765432 AQT8
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 15,085
  • Joined: 2005-June-23
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Las Vegas, NV

Posted 2007-April-05, 11:23

3 sounds good, the straightforward value bid. No reason to get fancy when there isn't a need to.
Please let me know about any questions or interest or bug reports about GIB.
0

#17 User is offline   ohioply 

  • PipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 44
  • Joined: 2007-January-09

Posted 2007-April-05, 14:27

What's the vulnerability? I like my king of spades and AK diamonds much more for defense since parter has already shown both majors. I think I'll be the lone doubler esp white v red and red v red - I don't want to see dummy drop with something like Q10xx Axx QJxx Ax after I bid 3 and my lho doubles me.
0

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users