BBO Discussion Forums: ACBL and Muiderberg Twos - BBO Discussion Forums

Jump to content

  • 4 Pages +
  • « First
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

ACBL and Muiderberg Twos

#61 User is offline   jtfanclub 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 3,937
  • Joined: 2004-June-05

Posted 2007-January-24, 21:51

Um, did you read the entire thread? It's entirely possible for a bid to be both natural and conventional. For example I think most people would agree that 1!S showing 4!S and 5+ cards in an unknown suit is conventional.
0

#62 User is offline   blackshoe 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 17,616
  • Joined: 2006-April-17
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Rochester, NY

Posted 2007-January-25, 09:10

Yes, I read the entire thread - though not in its entirety before my last post.

There is authority in the laws to regulate conventional bids. There is no authority in the laws to regulate purely natural (that is, not conventional) bids, save the ZO's authority to regulate such openings at the one level with a king less than average strength. Better?
--------------------
As for tv, screw it. You aren't missing anything. -- Ken Berg
I have come to realise it is futile to expect or hope a regular club game will be run in accordance with the laws. -- Jillybean
0
  • 4 Pages +
  • « First
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users