If you're not going to teach the bots any followups to positive responses then it would be better if they always bid 2♦ waiting.
Page 1 of 1
I didn't realise GIB was anti-science to this extent
#1
Posted 2014-December-12, 04:42
If you're not going to teach the bots any followups to positive responses then it would be better if they always bid 2♦ waiting.
"One of the painful things about our time is that those who feel certainty are stupid, and those with any imagination and understanding are filled with doubt and indecision"
-- Bertrand Russell
-- Bertrand Russell
#2
Posted 2014-December-12, 11:46
This is atrocious! It may stem from the explanation of the positive response as being forcing to 2NT when it obviously is GF.
Where are the 14-16 HCP shown by its horrid 6NT bid?
One wonders why if blasting to slam it didn't blast to slam in ♠ where's there's at least a known 8+ card fit?
Where are the 14-16 HCP shown by its horrid 6NT bid?
One wonders why if blasting to slam it didn't blast to slam in ♠ where's there's at least a known 8+ card fit?
#4
Posted 2014-December-12, 13:03
Forcing to 2N?! Do Gib programmers not think it can make 3N with only 30 pts?
Sarcasm is a state of mind
#5
Posted 2014-December-12, 13:27
steve2005, on 2014-December-12, 13:03, said:
Forcing to 2N?! Do Gib programmers not think it can make 3N with only 30 pts?
Obviously the layout is always something like
Feel free to remove a couple of jacks
Seriously though, it is as ridiculous as everyone is saying.
Wayne Somerville
Page 1 of 1